ACC Windows mixed reality

I totally agree that software is expected to do the job it's purchased for, and none of your examples have any relevance at all to PC leisure software.

Yes, I'm quite annoyed that in early access build 5 I can't use ACC because the UI for some reason is stuck 45 degrees to my left (it was ok earlier this evening, no idea why it's now screwed). But on the plus side, I'm not dead because of it.

 

That may be my problem. I come from development where it is done right the first time or it is not released so that is how I think.

 

I would say all software is expected to do the job, but then all software has bugs of one kind or another. All software has updates and fixes post release, unless abandoned. You're comparing EA to a software at 1.0+ release, so your point is still moot.

 

I have no problem with bugs. There will always be unexpected events or interactions. The fact that three releases later the same bugs are still there is a problem. That tells me the next release features are more important then the bug fixes for prior releases. That is coding to a schedule regardless of the quality. Not good practice.

 

Everybody knows that when ACC was made an "early release" was going to have issues until the final, thats what early release means.

If you don't understand what early release means, wait until the final release for the general public.

I have yet to experience ANY software that has not had issues, even though it was supposedly done right the first time.

 

How can you possibly compare aircraft software development to gaming software development they are developed in completely different ways

The type of critical software for aircraft has to work first time because if it does not people die, that's why aircraft software is developed by thousands of people and is tested by a few thousand more before it is used. Where governments and international authorities have input and set seriously high standards. Comparing critical software to gaming software is unrealistic.
Try to remember that ACC has not even been released yet. Why is it that people still don't understand the Meaning of EA.

I have no doubt that the developers at Kunos are working as hard as they can to resolve existing issues as well as ongoing continuing development, and they will succeed, i have no doubt. I am not a fanboy but I can already see the real potential of this game. Please have some perspective.

 

For users with wmr,,use your thumb stick hand set and press it down till a menu pops up..to reset the view in hdm.
Then you will be able to see the menu at the proper height.
Vr is supported in Acc but that doesn’t mean it works flawless,,in fact it is blurry,weird,no mouse,ackward ui,etc,I would say it is an experience at 70% of Rf2 or Pc2..at the moment in Vr..to give an idea.
For wmr it is even worse..
and as mentioned,,only a fraction of gamers uses vr,,
In fact it looks that most of users do not use vr and many think it is not the future of sim racing,
Furthermore .Acc at the moment is not for Vr nor for triple monitors,not even for MP,,it is a beta
Early access with an excellent price when it was released in September ,,,now it is priced at full price unfortunately...with the trims/functionality hardly at 50%,,,,
And most of the hot fixes are irrelevant considering major issues not targeted ,,although at least inMo they have explained. What it is going on and the reason of the delay,for Vr,triple,etc absolute silence....it is hard
To know what to expect...
Wait till 1.0 seems the most sensible thing to do with Acc...
Rgds

 

I'm really enjoying ACC right now, at a great price, and know it will get even better, so happy.

Also being part of how it evolves, maybe in a VERY small way, but at least I have a place for my input.

Work on the high % usage issues, the lower % will follow.

 

Unexistant development?

 

You live in Utopia then. That's a nice place to live on. I certainly envy you.

Enviado desde mi ONEPLUS A5010 mediante Tapatalk

 

Just still waiting for this fix....