1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties. If you report a crash, ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Crashes" folder in the same directory. Do not post "I have the same issue" in an existing thread, open your own thread.
  2. When reporting an issue with saved games, please always zip and attach your entire User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione/Savegame folder, along with the logs and the crash folder (when reporting related to a crash).
  3. If your game doesn't start or the executable is missing, please add your entire Steam directory to the exceptions in your antivirus software, then run a Steam integrity check or reinstall the game altogether. Make sure you add the User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione folder to your antivirus/Defender exceptions and exclude it from any file sharing app (GDrive, OneDrive or Dropbox)!

ACC Opinion.

Discussion in 'ACC General Discussions' started by SimGuy_1, May 30, 2019.

Tags:
?

ACC's Goal.

Poll closed Jun 19, 2019.
  1. physics,A.I,Optimization etc.

    23 vote(s)
    63.9%
  2. Multiplayer stuff.

    13 vote(s)
    36.1%
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. SimGuy_1

    SimGuy_1 Alien

    Just wanna ask you guys that whether you all prefer physics,optimization,A.I OR multiplayer aspects.
    I'm asking this because this game is absolutely fantastic and it has "mixed"score on steam for multiplayer.which is understandable but i would rather have a proper offline simulator with leading physics and great performance rather than online.
    Yes some of you might say they should do both better but that's just impossible to do for example look at iracing it is benchmark for sim online community(multiplayer aspect) but physics are below ACC and Rfactor 2(i've played them all) and also iracing has no A.I so there will always be a compromise.So IMO i would rather have industry leading physics(simulation),A.I and ofcourse good optimization etc(single player stuff).
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2019
    A-Jin and LucaBenj like this.

  2. Similar Threads
    Forum Title Date
    ACC Troubleshooting Freezing after accessing Control settings Yesterday at 2:07 PM
    ACC User Interface ACC v1.8 - CINEMA HUD focal length bug Sunday at 5:31 PM
    ACC Troubleshooting ACC 1.8 - Fatal Error Saturday at 12:32 PM
    ACC Hardware Discussions BJSimracing brake pedal issue in ACC Friday at 6:38 PM
    ACC Controls & Peripherals First launch of ACC no FFB, close/reopen FFB works Friday at 2:59 PM
    ACC Screenshots & Videos ACC | Leo Sousa - Hotlaps, Setups, Track Guide, Prime Skins, Coaching and Tips Thursday at 4:52 AM
    ACC Virtual Reality 11/30/21 ACC 1.8.4 not responding after leaving main menu in VR Dec 1, 2021
    GUI - HUDs - Apps Bugs & Issues ACC User Interface Nov 29, 2021
    ACC Troubleshooting I5 ACC Compatibility Nov 28, 2021
    ACC General Discussions ACC v1.8x - cars season 21 [2020 DLC missing] Nov 27, 2021
    ACC Rating & Leaderboards ACC V1.8.2 CP Rating 0 from race Nov 27, 2021
    ACC Screenshots & Videos ACC make photo's during race or replay Nov 26, 2021
    ACC Troubleshooting ACC Update Paused: Win10 threat protection blocking [Update your Win Defender db] Nov 25, 2021
    ACC Gameplay V1.8.0 ACC freeze when continuing a (new V1.8) career or championship Nov 25, 2021
    ACC Troubleshooting Various bugs in ACC 1.8 Nov 24, 2021

  3. You honestly think that the devs will give two tosses about the results of this poll? LOL

    (and doesn't physics and optimizations affect both SP and MP?)
     
  4. martcerv

    martcerv Alien

    Different people work on different things, its not like they are going to abandon any aspects they think can be improved. I also highly doubt they will abandon MP because of a few mixed steam reviews. ;)
     
    TheBoss likes this.
  5. A-Jin

    A-Jin Racer

    I don't think he meant this for devs to look for.He just asking for our opinion.
     
    SimGuy_1 and LucaBenj like this.
  6. LucaBenj

    LucaBenj Racer

    The product is fantastic!
    But It's not perfect, of course it is v 1.0.
    For example I would focus on optimization efforts and some bugs still present. One above all is that fizzy stuttering that occurs in different scenarios, especially in multiplayer when a new player enters the server
     
  7. SimGuy_1

    SimGuy_1 Alien

    Yea i understand what you trying to say but if those resources were used for single player aspects of sim rather than multiplayer then not only the whole sim can be developed quickly but also it will be much more focused.When you add complexity or make a project more ambitious then there will be more compromises than if the product were developed having focused goal.There is a reason why ACC has best physics for gt3 cars because they focused solely on gt3 cars.
     
  8. SimGuy_1

    SimGuy_1 Alien

    I never said it(poll)was for devs to look for LOL.Read my post again you did not understand what i said.
     
  9. Sorry, but pointless thread/poll is pointless.
     
    R. Iván likes this.
  10. SimGuy_1

    SimGuy_1 Alien

    That is your opinion so no problem.
     
  11. Winston

    Winston Hardcore Simmer

    I think they will do both given time and it's probably too soon to worry about steam opinions.
    For me I would like them to sort, or at least communicate re multi viewport and Track IR.
    I worry this relatively small group have been sacrificed on the alter of console sales during the UR4 evaluation phase.

    Sorry , didn't mean to high-jack the thread.
     
  12. TheBoss

    TheBoss Hardcore Simmer

    This thread is a bit absurd. Kunos is not going to fire his workers and hire others to work in a single section.
    As a user that survey seems absurd, I do not want to choose an option because none is good, I do not want them to develop only one section, I want all areas to improve.
     
  13. SimGuy_1

    SimGuy_1 Alien

    I was just asking opinion as well as stating mine and how did you even get the idea of me indicating firing some staff?? Be polite mate and reading your reply i can totally see that you clearly did not understand the post.
    Besides just saying "all areas to improve" is pointless as there will be always some compromises made so i rather compromise multiplayer and have a simulator with top physics because budget is not infinite and neither is staff.
     
  14. SimGuy_1

    SimGuy_1 Alien

    Yea they will improve both i'm sure of it but my point is that there is a reason why iracing is subscription based services because these multiplayer components cost so much money and time so for me multiplayer is not important at all.My point is that since Kunos has limits resources i would rather have them focused on core single player aspects then go to multiplayer.
    People giving negative reviews just because multiplayer sends out bad signal that customers would rather have better multiplayer than simulator.
     
  15. So the point of this thread is you telling Kunos that they should abandon work on MP and direct all resources to the areas that YOU want. Good luck with that. Pointless thread is still pointless. (and that is absolute fact, not opinion)
     
    Jebus and martcerv like this.
  16. Winston

    Winston Hardcore Simmer

    I've seen it quoted many times that IR is subscription because of multiplayer components or the like.
    I've yet to be convinced that a particular piece of game software has to be subscription because of cost of development/maintenance.
    I think it's only subscription because it's lucrative, which is fair enough I suppose.

    Anyway back on topic, I think any optimisation they can do would be greatly appreciated so that will get my vote (if I have to :) ).
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice