1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties. If you report a crash, ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Crashes" folder in the same directory.
  2. FOR ASSETTO CORSA COMPETIZIONE: If you report issues with saved games, please always zip and attach your entire User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione/Savegame folder!
  3. If your game executable is missing, please add your entire Steam directory to the exceptions in your antivirus software, then run a Steam integrity check or reinstall the game altogether.

Car time ranking

Discussion in 'Chit Chat Room' started by WallyM, Mar 21, 2015.

  1. Trezoitao38

    Trezoitao38 Simracer

    Will include japanese pack on the list?
  2. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    Once there's an RSR rank reset, yes.
    Rolz likes this.
  3. Billy Pilgrim

    Billy Pilgrim Rookie

    This is valuable info you've produced here and I'm thankful for it.

    Re the "AC 1.5+ CAR RANK (May 13, 2016)" data you present: is that only taking into account laptimes made after 1.5?

    Also, just to check I've understood this properly: in the lap data you have, the Lotus Exos 125 Stage 1 is 2.15 secs slower than the 98T, and the Lotus Exos 125 is 7.41 secs slower than the Lotus Exos 125 Stage 1? Is that the way to read this?

    I'm well surprised that the Audi R8 LMS Ultra is faster than the GT2 cars. I thought the Audi LMS Ultra was classed as a GT3 car. Am I wrong? And there are other GT3 cars that are faster than the BMW GT2.
  4. f1webberfan

    f1webberfan Simracer

    Hmmm, you are not the only 1.
    I'm far from the best driver but ... even with setup ... in my book, the R8 is like 3 seconds slower than the GT2 cars ...
    Strange ...
  5. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    Yes, the ”1.5+” means times are from AC 1.5 or later.

    Yes, you're reading the gaps correctly.

    I'll check the positions of the Audi and the GT3 cars. That doesn't seem right.

    Edit: Yes, according to the times on the RSR rank, the Audi is faster than, or comparable to, the GT2 cars since 1.5. I see, just looking at the Ferrari GT2 at Spa, that times have slowed down since before 1.5, so it looks like the GT2 car has become slower, while the Audi has become quicker.

    For example, just looking at the 1.5+ WR at Spa, the Audi is 2:15.6 and the Ferrari is 2:15.8. It doesn't seem right though. It might be best to wait for the release of the new RSR Rank app, and let the rank times accumulate again after the board reset.
    Last edited: May 24, 2016
  6. Billy Pilgrim

    Billy Pilgrim Rookie

    Your Ferrari data would seem to agree with the list of updates for 1.5.4 which note: "Some Balance of Performance for Ferrari 458 GT2, more might needed"
  7. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    Ranking updated for AC version 1.5 and greater. Now includes the new Japanese Pack cars.
  8. ALB123

    ALB123 Alien

    I'm having a hard time understanding the new 1.5+ Car Rank. I understood the older list, I think, but this one has me scratching my head.

    Lotus 98T, , 16
    Lotus Exos 125 Stage 1, 2.08, 266
    Lotus Exos 125, 6.63, 186
    Dallara F312, 14.53, 236

    Does this mean that the Exos 125 Stage 1 is 2.08 seconds behind the Lotus 98T? The Lotus Exos 125 is 6.63 seconds behind the Lotus 98T and the Dallara F312 is 14.53 seconds behind the Lotus 98T?

    If I'm reading that correctly, great, but then it all falls apart for me. After the Dallara F312 it is obvious that the remaining cars are not showing how many seconds they are behind the Lotus 98T. For instance, the Ferrari F40 shows 0.00 and there is obviously no way that the Ferrari F40 is as fast as the Lotus 98T.

    So, what the heck am I not understanding? I've been staring at this list for 20 minutes and I am at a complete loss. :( :oops:
  9. AC_RAF

    AC_RAF Hardcore Simmer

    I understand that the Lotus Exos is 6.63 second slower than the Lotus Stage 1. It's always the time between a car and the previous one I think.
    Sometimes suprising but I understand that this way.

    Am I wrong? :)
  10. ALB123

    ALB123 Alien

    Hmm...Well that certainly makes more sense than what I was thinking. :D:eek: Hopefully someone will confirm soon.
    AC_RAF likes this.
  11. Billy Pilgrim

    Billy Pilgrim Rookie

    I asked this question, more or less, in post 83 and got a reply in post 85
    ALB123 likes this.
  12. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    That's correct. It's to take into account some cars not having any times at all at certain tracks, making it of course impossible to compare times at those tracks.
    AC_RAF likes this.
  13. ALB123

    ALB123 Alien

    Thank you. Normally I'm not quite so lazy in asking questions without going through the posts first. In this particular case, I saw a post on Reddit discussing the 1.5+ data & expressing confusion on how to read the data. I jumped right to this thread and posted when I should have read. Sorry about that everybody.
  14. Nekrobob

    Nekrobob Hardcore Simmer

    Any Chances for an 1.7.5 update?
  15. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    I'm waiting for the RSR rank reset.
  16. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    I'm only going to include PRO rank times now, to compare times on a level playing field under the same conditions. But there aren't as many PRO rank times on the rank as non-PRO, so if you want to provide valuable data for this car ranking, set PRO times at these tracks:

    Spa,Mugello,Imola,Silverstone GP,Nurburgring - GP,Vallelunga,Monza,Magione,Zandvoort,Barcelona - GP,Brands Hatch - GP,Red Bull Ring GP
    Poguinhas and Rolz like this.
  17. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    Keep those PRO lap times coming!
  18. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    I updated the first post with an AC 1.7+ car rank, but it's still really rough because there aren't enough PRO laps in the RSR rank yet.
    SvenUilhoorn, Nekrobob and AC_RAF like this.
  19. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    Updated, also added Tripl3 pack cars and the Audi S1.
    Tibalotte and xedrox like this.
  20. WallyM

    WallyM Alien

    Continuing updates....
    xedrox, Billy Pilgrim and Rolz like this.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
ACC Screenshots & Videos ACC Best Car Dashboard/View | Rankings Jun 12, 2019
Screens & Videos Assetto Corsa Competizione - Best Car Dashboard/View | Rankings Jun 12, 2019
Bug reports Career Championships number of drivers in race different than in the ranking screen Aug 4, 2017
Screens & Videos Sim racing paddock sim car rankings - ac highlight Feb 11, 2015
Chit Chat Room Cars do a rolling motion since the new update Yesterday at 12:36 AM
ACC Physics cannot find the aero variation % in gt4 cars Sep 17, 2021
Graphics and Models/Tracks Bugs & Issues Car is invisible after changing the model Sep 11, 2021
ACC Multiplayer Invisible Cars on Track Sep 5, 2021
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Car Electronics Settings Randomly Changing Aug 25, 2021
Chit Chat Room The Hyundai Elantra N is a track-ready sports car with 276 horsepower for 2022. Aug 23, 2021
ACC Controls & Peripherals Minimum brake pressure is ~5% when inside the car. Aug 17, 2021
ACC General Discussions Default camera views point all over the place....even under car...lol Aug 16, 2021
ACC Graphics - Tracks and Cars replay helicam white line track boundary shines through cars "z-index" issue Monza Aug 16, 2021
General modding discussion Is there a go-to place for downloading cars and tracks? Aug 14, 2021
ACC PS4 - XB1 General Discussions Car won't move. Engine running, WTF? Aug 13, 2021

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice