Discussing Unreal

also, do we know if they aren't using either already?

 

deferred rendering and the vr in unreal they do not get along

Both MSAA and TAA are post processes and these go as stages within the deferred pipeline


sure kunos will get to solve that problem

 

Since this is the “official” support forum, would be nice if someone from Kunos could share some insight on the deferred vs forward shading. The times when just down playing how many user use VR are over, VR user represent a large number of actual and potential ACC driver now, it is Kunos best interest to improve VR in this title.

 

I just got a brand new gaming pc and the setting you are discussing are no longer there for me, I’m confused because my other gaming pc has the settings available. Both pc’s have nvidia control panel

Baz

 

Is it maybe because I have went from a GTX 1060 to an RTX 2070?

Baz

 

Got any statistics?

 

Maybe you have an old Nvidia driver? Version: 441.08 2019.10.29 "Adds support for image-sharpening from NVIDIA Control Panel"

 

thanks I’ll update tomorrow

baz

 

To be fair,the post count in the VR forum which would suggest a large amount of VR users playing/trying to play ACC(although the many issues with VR might account for this large number)

 

https://strawpoll.com/zh35w4sg?fbclid=IwAR33CRY2nzfrMftUNssNoFnogfiM-nT2e_82TI6Z9fT4YNgaFat2YLiydi0

 

That's a bit underwhelming.

 

Indeed, considering 468 people who voted in that poll are hardly representative for... anything.

 

A lot of the posts in the VR forum are, like most forums, from the same people so it gives a false impression of how many are actually involved in the discussion. I would guess that the number of racers using VR is similar to the number using it for flight sims. There’s a big survey carried out each year by Navigraph (about 15,000 respondents in 2018) which includes VR stats and last year 17% said they owned a VR headset - see https://download.navigraph.com/docs/navigraph-flightsim-community-survey-2018-final.pdf#page49. VR users tend to be a very vocal minority so it often looks as if there are many more of them than there are in reality.

 

While VR users are a minority it is a fairly fast growing one relative to the sim racing user base and in time will be the standard majority while screen users will become the minority as it will only be used by people that can’t do VR for whatever reason

 

Regardless of the number of vr users, Kunos have,said they are continually working to improve VR. It would be nice to know what they have explored and what if anything is still to be investigated. I'm not holding my breath though, maybe opening a dialogue would be opening a can of worms.

 

To all doubting VR is not a minority anymore among people driving a serious SIM like ACC, how about a poll right here (acc general discussion) right now.
You will see that for this group, which is the only one that matters to us, VR is more used than the 2 other display alternative, single and triple.

Welcome to 2020 and happy new year,

 

Unless you can guarantee EVERYBODY replies, won't prove anything.

 

Wide,16:9,or triple,those are all screens. And should be as one. Not separated.

Happy new year to everyone.

Sent from SM-N975F using Tapatalk

 

I think single, triple and VR are a good split as more PC grunt and specific development is required for the 2nd two. However, I think only Kunos can provide a valid set of results (if they can determine it).

 

But every poll is just the same.
It is a snap shot of what people in general like/dislike (or what ever the poll is trying to show).
I don't think I have EVER known a poll where 'everyone' replies, it will simply never happen.
Unfortunately its one of the best, reliable and only ways we can estimate things.