.ini files on ac graphics - how to

SBAM!

 

monza 66 10.00, reverse drive

 

fixed the autoexposure...

 

maybe we have different understandings, but with your target set to 0.18, isnt the exposure just locked at 0.7?

 

Don't think so, but just try to set fixed exposure at 0.7 and check 13:00 and at 18:00 into the shadows car camera to see if the luminosity is the same...
Andrea_gi

 

interesting, identical at 13:00 but at 18:00 drastically different, the target works completley different to how i guessed, so 0.18 is indeed a sensible value for your filter, learn something new every day!

ah youre also using different metering region, i guess this helps to get good exposure on external cams, espc on white cars, the default is obviously designed just for cockpit view

 

sorted my autoexposure now, had to set min limit a little higher to reduce the number of transitions on hilly tracks like lake louise where you end up looking at the sky often, left the metering region default as im not as fussed about replays

 

this file is an edited andrea file but for no sweetfx?

 

some onboard pics

 

couple of party shoots



this one is so low blurred because the pp set have dof aperture at 10
is want more dof blur set aperture to 6-8

 

because in screenshot 3d doen't like a lot of amazing shoots i put them here

 

can't stop...
guys i'm so satisfied...

 

photo pp set

nat pp set

 

nat definitely the way forward, for me the only thing i'd say is i dont think its possible to get a believable blue sky (as set by the default weather and colourcurves) without tonemapping set to function=1 as it is in the default PP preset. not too much of an issue for screenshots but in cockpit view when you see the sky a lot i find it hard to believe the sky would be so unsaturated/white

 

actually the "problem" is that the clouds are low height always on horizon view...BTW if you look at yourself profile image the sky is a lot white at the horizon...

 

In a photo because of IR etc, for realistic look though it should generally be more linear imo

 

function 1

 

It's like trying to find Waldo when trying to find the differences in your screenshot comparisons.