The ACC GPU Benchmark Thread

This is a spin-off to "The ACC Benchmark Thread":

https://www.assettocorsa.net/forum/index.php?threads/the-acc-benchmark-thread.53257/

While that one is about optimizing systems and learning about which settings affect which GPU/CPU the most, this one is focussed on pure GPU performance.

You'll need to download FRAPS - it's free, lean and easy to use. You can get it here, for example:

https://www.chip.de/downloads/FRAPS_13010723.html

Set up a hotkey for benchmarking and tick the checkbox at "Stop benchmark after 60 seconds".



IMPORTANT: Deactivate FPS cap and VSYNC for the benchmark run! It can potentially make your system look worse than it actually is! Adaptive sync like FreeSync and GSync can remain active.

Now, set up a hotlap session like this:



Here's a zoom-in on the left red box:



Those are the fixed video settings you need to use:




Important: since the view and FOV have a big impact on the FPS performance, they're also fixed:

View/Camera: Copckpit (not dash, not helmet)
FOV: 45

Start the session. As soon as you're in the cockpit, hit the benchmark hotkey. Drive in a moderate way - not too slow, not too fast - until the benchmark is finished. You'll notice this by the FPS counter reappearing in the corner of the screen.

Open this thread and post the FRAPS result from the file FRAPSLOG.txt.

Please write down your CPU, GPU and RAM and make sure your signature is up to date.

Here's the preview picture of the result table including all valid test runs.


Looking forward to seeing your results

 

First result is mine ;-)

i5 7600k
RX Vega 64
8 GB RAM

2018-11-23 13:24:30 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 4000 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 66.667 - Min: 50 - Max: 92

 

i5 7300hq
gtx 1050 2GB
8 GB

2018-11-24 19:24:36 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 1460 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 24.333 - Min: 16 - Max: 36

 

Table added to post 1.

Let's see some more results - don't just lurk around here ;-)

 

Intel i5 4670K
Nvidia GTX 970
8 GB RAM

2018-11-24 09:58:11 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2923 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 48.717 - Min: 34 - Max: 69

You can stick me in as TT otherwise it might mess up your table formatting.

Great job btw!

 

i7-8700k gtx1080ti 16gb ram no overclocks.

Per the guidelines:
2018-11-24 12:21:09 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 6863 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 114.383 - Min: 85 - Max: 168

I was a bit intrigued by the other comments on FOV and view settings (spoiler: I don't find any significant difference...) , so did the same test, but altered as follows:
FOV 45, dash view
2018-11-24 12:24:38 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 6965 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 116.083 - Min: 92 - Max: 160
FOV 45, helmet view.
2018-11-24 12:26:08 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 6732 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 112.200 - Min: 89 - Max: 158


Then, changing also the FOV to 70 (just to pick a significantly different number than the above)
Cockpit view (same as post guidelines, but with FOV 70)
2018-11-24 12:28:25 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 7022 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 117.033 - Min: 96 - Max: 162
Dash view
2018-11-24 12:29:50 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 6958 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 115.967 - Min: 91 - Max: 162
Helmet view
2018-11-24 12:31:17 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 6802 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 113.367 - Min: 89 - Max: 157

 

That's a lot of FPS! So it seems you were CPU limited here:

https://www.assettocorsa.net/forum/...cc-benchmark-thread.53257/page-4#post-1010291

The relationship FOV --> FPS is also still a bit mysterious to me. Lower FOV = lower FPS doesn't seem to apply, universally.

 

Tested with my Laptop stock, no undervolting nor oc.
i7 8750H 3,9Ghz in ACC
16GB SingleRam 2400
GTX 1070 1,8Ghz in ACC

Default FOV 54:
2018-11-24 13:41:27 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 4597 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 76.617 - Min: 59 - Max: 109

FOV 45:
2018-11-24 13:47:53 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 4453 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 74.217 - Min: 54 - Max: 107

Didnt worked out for me with lower FOV i see.

 

I used this PC: RyZen R5 1600 - MSI B350M Mortar - MSI R9 285 (max OC) - G.Skill Aegis 16 GB DDR4-3000 - Alpenföhn Materhorn Pure AM4 - Corsair CX 600M - 4TB SSHD - Windows 10 Home - T500 RS


Default FOV 54:
2018-11-24 13:56:00 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 1555 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 25.917 - Min: 15 - Max: 39

FOV 45:
2018-11-24 13:58:24 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 1537 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 25.617 - Min: 18 - Max: 38

 

i5 3750@4,4 Ghz
16GB
GTX 770

2018-11-24 15:02:33 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2249 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 37.483 - Min: 26 - Max: 55

 

Managed to get 2 more FPS and some additional fan noise by setting the driver profile to "Turbo" in Radeon Settings.

i5 7600k
RX Vega 64
8 GB RAM

2018-11-24 15:01:52 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 4138 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 68.967 - Min: 52 - Max: 97

 

If you guys want to check out whether your GPU performs somehow as a expectied in ACC, go to this site and look for the table "GPU Performance Index (Overall)":

http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Radeo...6623/Tests/Benchmark-Preis-Release-1235445/3/

As it stands from the results currently in this thread, my GPU does underperform in ACC. Compared to the 1080 Ti and the 970 in here, my GPU performs like an R9 Fury X. According to the table, my GPU could be 30 - 40 % faster.
But I'm not gonna jump to conclusions again on this, like I did in some other threads

Instead I'll collect more data here. Should it hold true that AMD consistently underperforms...well we should maybe cry our heart out to Kunos and also at the AMD forum, lol!

 

2018-11-24 14:46:10 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 4031 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 67.183 - Min: 47 - Max: 104

2018-11-24 14:47:38 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2317 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 38.617 - Min: 28 - Max: 56

2018-11-24 14:48:50 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2306 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 38.433 - Min: 28 - Max: 54

2018-11-24 14:50:47 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2311 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 38.517 - Min: 29 - Max: 55

2018-11-24 14:52:05 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2253 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 37.550 - Min: 29 - Max: 55

I think I drove too slowly in the first test so you may want to disregard that one.

All your settings used, my FOV is 45 anyway
Specs in signature.

 

2018-11-24 16:40:44 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 2221 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 37.017 - Min: 26 - Max: 53

Ryzen 5 2600
2x8GB 3200mhz cl16
Sapphire rx470 4GB nitro+

 

Something is wrong - your FPS are way too low. Check post 1 carefully and try again please.

 

Yeah it does seem strange, I will double check and run again later.

 

Well his FX CPU is surely weak, everyone knows that.
He might be CPU limitated i think.

And as said in other topics. AMD cards perform not good again.
They didnt in AC1 either compared to Nvidia and arent doing better in ACC.

 

No. That CPU performed perfectly fine in the other benchmark and here we don't even have AI.

Another user scored 76 AVG FPS with a notebook 1070 in this thread.

 

Oh well yea. No AI, my fault.
Then he really needs to check.
His Desktop 1070 should be faster than my Notebook 1070.

Gesendet von meinem HTC One mit Tapatalk

 

2018-11-24 18:56:54 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
Frames: 4041 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 67.350 - Min: 48 - Max: 96

FX3850
GTX980Ti
16GB Ram