1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties. If you report a crash, ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Crashes" folder in the same directory.
  2. FOR ASSETTO CORSA COMPETIZIONE: If you report issues with saved games, please always zip and attach your entire User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione/Savegame folder!
  3. If your game executable is missing, please add your entire Steam directory to the exceptions in your antivirus software, then run a Steam integrity check or reinstall the game altogether.

The ACC GPU Benchmark Thread

Discussion in 'ACC General Discussions' started by LeDude83, Nov 23, 2018.

  1. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Thanks. Will return the 2070, though. It is far superior regarding FPS over my Vega but the FreeSync doesn't work too well. The smoothness is more important to me than the extra effects I can add with the 2070.

    Will AMD have a new high-end series any time soon? Navi is expected for late summer but AFAIK it's gonna be midrange.
     
  2. Deatroy

    Deatroy Alien

    Oh yea gsync compatible is not always working. I had to wait for 419.35 until it worked.

    We need to watch for Computex in May. First Infos are expected to be announced.

    Not fully right.
    There are 2 Navi Series planned. One for midrange low end and one for High Performance, but second one comes way later. Atleast the speculatius says so... but first real 7nm products. Vega 20 wasn't a full 7nm jump, just resized to fit in.

    For me Ryzen 3000 is more interesting.
    Xeon 1231v3 from my bro will be replaced by 8 or 12 core 3000 Zen. Hopefully OC close to 5Ghz

    Gesendet von meinem EML-L29 mit Tapatalk
     
  3. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Ah, I didn't know that 2 Navi series were planned. For now my system runs very well so I can wait. I'm actually very happy with what I have now.

    But I wasn't clear enough: Gsync compatible did work turning it on and off was night and day difference. But running FreeSync with the Vega was night and day, again. The 2070 had notable blur during movements and some hick-ups. With the Vega it's like liquid paint is flowing across the screen.
     
    Deatroy likes this.
  4. Stekelly1980

    Stekelly1980 Rookie

    Will there be an official benchmark?
     
  5. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    IDK
     
  6. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Here's my 1.0 result - very much the same as 0.7.2:

    2019-05-30 00:34:31 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 4218 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 70.300 - Min: 54 - Max: 105

    @pankykapus there are some new settings. How do I need to set them to where they were in 0.7.2. Volumetric fog e.g. was on/off previously but now it's disabled/low/mid/high.
     
  7. Jynnantonix

    Jynnantonix Simracer

    Bump, any appetite to update this now that we have 1.x released?
     
    Salvatore Amato likes this.
  8. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    That would be up to the other users. But the GPU performance actually never changed from the very first version. So everything you see in the table is up to date.
     
  9. flihp

    flihp Racer

    just re did a test for the fun of it.
    my results back on 0.3.5
    2018-12-02 15:26:42 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 4530 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 75.500 - Min: 59 - Max: 106

    my results now on 1.04, with Volumetric fog on highest setting and Hlod enabled.
    019-06-16 11:00:47 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 3830 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 63.833 - Min: 44 - Max: 107

    results with volumetric fog disabled.
    2019-06-16 11:03:52 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 4617 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 76.950 - Min: 60 - Max: 116

    so personally nothing really changed in performance, but visual quality is improved ( to me anyway).
     
  10. guys i noticed a strange thing...when you have shadows on high the fps is superior to when it is on medium...strange...
    i am on 1080ti and playing in 4k
     
  11. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Could you please back this claim up with the results of 2 GPU benchmark runs with the shadows to medium and high? It doesn't have to be exactly like in the OP of this thread - any 60 s run with FRAPS or Afterburner in hotlap mode will do.

    Not saying you're not right, but in order to properly discuss the claim, we must prove it. That's the systematic approach.
     
  12. broadappeal

    broadappeal Rookie

    Thanks for very usefull thread.

    Ver 1.0.4
    GPU RX570 GDDR4 4GB
    CPU i3-4160
    RAM 8GB

    2019-06-19 22:00:34 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 1970 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 32.833 - Min: 23 - Max: 52

    I want to upgrade my old cpu and gpu asap.
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  13. Schnipp

    Schnipp Alien

    Wait a few weeks more before upgrading, AMD's Ryzen 3000 CPU's and Navi GPU's are about to be released on July 7th.

    Depending on prices and performance it might be either a good choice or it might lead to prices of current gear to maybe drop in price a bit more or shops are giving good deals to clear inventory.
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  14. Berniyh

    Berniyh Alien

    Running Windows 7:
    CPU: AMD FX4350 @ 4.5 GHz
    GPU: AMD RX Vega 64
    RAM: DDR3-1333

    (Yeah, so pretty old system apart from the GPU, Upgrade pending once the Ryzen 3000 is widely available.)

    Frames: 3154 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 52.567 - Min: 40 - Max: 84
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  15. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Thanks for sharing. The results are suspiciously poor, though. As you will have noticed, the fixed settings in post 1 aren't up to date, anymore. You might have chosen overly harsh settings in your run. You posted the worst Vega results so far in the database - I don't think that even with the old CPU the results should be so bad.

    @pankykapus could you please review the settings in Post 1 and tell me which ones to choose for the additional options we have by now? We managed to keep the results comparable from day 1 one, it would be a shame to lose that database now. Thanks.
     
  16. Berniyh

    Berniyh Alien

    I notice quite often that my CPU is limiting in ACC, so I wouldn't rule that out, also keep in mind that my memory is very slow, even by DDR3 standards.
    I tried to track all of the settings down, but of course some are new, some might have been removed.
    Apart from that, not running Windows 10 might also be an influence.

    Oh and after all, it could be that ACC just performs differently now, because things change during early access.
    Maybe you should just retry your benchmark results with current ACC and see what you get. ;)
     
  17. Edit: there was a stupid question, answer found
     
    Last edited: Jul 8, 2019
  18. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Here's my run with 1.0:

    This is almost exactly the same as with 0.6.5 (see table in first post). Also from other systems, there has been no indication so far that the GPU performance has changed much ever since I started recording this.

    I don't know your CPU very well but I don't think that it will bottleneck in hotlap mode. CPU stress is greatly increased by other cars are being rendered - regardless of MP or SP.

    There's no point in discussing this - it can easily be tested. Install Afterburner, log the GPU usage and re-run the GPU benchmark. If GPU drops below 100 %, your theory will seem to be correct.

    I still think it's the settings you chose - what was volumetric fog set to, for example? It's a hard hitter on the FPS. I'm pretty sure running it at max doesn't equate to the previous "enabled".
     
  19. Berniyh

    Berniyh Alien

    ok, I'll have a look.
     
  20. Berniyh

    Berniyh Alien

    Tried again and I think one issue is that I had ACs frame monitor activated. That cost a bit in performance.
    With that the new values are:
    Avg: 59.4 - Min: 49 - Max: 96

    I tried a few other settings, but couldn't find anything that wasn't clearly specified and making a huge difference towards higher framerates.

    I did some GPU profiling with WattMan and it's mostly at around 95-100%, but drops down to 70-90% occasionally.
    So it's mostly in the GPU limit, but not always.
    That could explain why it's especially the average that is lower in my case, but the peak is in between the other two Vega 64 in the list.
     
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
ACC Virtual Reality Upgrade GPU for VR ACC? Jul 20, 2019
ACC General Discussions ACC - 0.5.2 - Performance Review by GameGPU (29 GPUS & 27 CPUS) Jan 22, 2019
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Launcher crashes on start (solved: disable gpu accelerated launcher) Jan 3, 2015
Chit Chat Room What is "GPU-accelerated startup"? May 12, 2014
Chit Chat Room GPU accelerated game launcher? Dec 5, 2013
Suggestions GPU-accelerated game launcher Nov 24, 2013
ACC Multiplayer ACC Serveur error Wednesday at 10:15 PM
ACC Multiplayer All ports that acc uses Tuesday at 12:52 PM
ACC General Discussions ACC Driving Academy Tuesday at 12:45 PM
ACC General Discussions Test: CPU Core count and RAM scaling in ACC, AC1 and R3E Tuesday at 10:49 AM
ACC Virtual Reality Pimax 5k Plus dont work in ACC ??? Monday at 9:51 PM
ACC General Discussions Deleting Account. Monday at 3:13 AM
ACC General Discussions ACC Setup Tyre Pressure Adjuster Sunday at 9:12 AM
ACC General Discussions ACC Results Companion Sunday at 7:14 AM
ACC Online Leagues / Championships room New ACC Porsche GT3 Cup Championship Aug 14, 2019

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice