1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties. If you report a crash, ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Crashes" folder in the same directory.
  2. FOR ASSETTO CORSA COMPETIZIONE: If you report issues with saved games, please always zip and attach your entire User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione/Savegame folder!
  3. If your game executable is missing, please add your entire Steam directory to the exceptions in your antivirus software, then run a Steam integrity check or reinstall the game altogether.

Why does nobody try compete with iracing?

Discussion in 'Chit Chat Room' started by Jynnantonix, Nov 5, 2015.

  1. Jynnantonix

    Jynnantonix Simracer

    I'm sure most you know what a phenomenal success IRacing is, because although in my opinion the driving is less realistic / enjoyable than other sims, the multiplayer service is almost perfect.

    If I was developer of Assetto Corsa, Stock Car Extreme, Rfactor2 and RRE, I would be thinking 'hmm so Iracing has a sim that I don't think drives as well as mine and most people will spend anywhere from the same amount up to 20 times as much to play it. Imagine how they'll come flocking to us if we offer a similar online experience!'

    No doubt it is not an easy task to make an online service as good as IRacing, but there is already a modder in AC busy making a similar thing just in his spare time, so it cant be that hard. I just don't get why nobody is trying to compete with this phenomenally successful business model.

  2. Similar Threads
    Forum Title Date
    Multiplayer Bugs & Issues My server doesn't appear on main list Yesterday at 7:24 PM
    Screens & Videos Does anyone know who created this track? Wednesday at 5:15 PM
    ACC Hardware Discussions 2 x Radeon RX580 (Crossfire): does it work in ACC? What CPU goes well with them? Tuesday at 2:01 PM
    ACC Controls & Peripherals gamepad doesn't work Mar 27, 2020
    ACC Hardware Discussions How well does the RX 5600 XT perform @ 5760x1080 triple monitor setup? Mar 25, 2020
    ACC Troubleshooting save does not work when there are cyrillic characters in the path to the save folder Mar 23, 2020
    Multiplayer Bugs & Issues Server does not work on Wi-Fi only Mar 16, 2020
    ACC Gameplay First lap doesn't count when starting from the pit lane Mar 8, 2020
    Chit Chat Room Does having force feedback wheel help? Mar 6, 2020
    ACC User Interface Setup saving doesn't change saved status on first try Feb 26, 2020
    ACC Gameplay damaged AI car doesn't pit and ruins the race for everyone Feb 25, 2020
    ACC Rating & Leaderboards Special Event, Season 6 55/58 doesn´t count for me Feb 23, 2020
    ACC Rating & Leaderboards SA Rating dropped, but doesn´t raise after the first lap! Feb 20, 2020
    Troubleshooting - Workarounds AC doesn't launch anymore Feb 11, 2020
    Physics Bugs & Issues AI doesn't improve during qualifying session Feb 10, 2020

  3. David Wright

    David Wright Hardcore Simmer

    The prime reason is 80-90% of sim racers don't race on-line.

    So while iRacing have grown to dominate the on-line side, they still only have 60,000 members after many years on sale compared to ACs 250,000 sales and pCARS 1.5 million sales.
    detoit, Epistolarius, Octane and 7 others like this.
  4. Jos_theboss

    Jos_theboss Hardcore Simmer

    And iracing had some rich guy backing them.
  5. Pete Gaimari

    Pete Gaimari Racer

    Do you want AC to be pay to play?
  6. Mogster

    Mogster Alien

    The iRacing devs have John Henry's millions backing them. Its a different situation than the one developers normally find themselves in.

    Is iRacing a "huge" success really? Has it turned a profit yet???
    tabis likes this.
  7. bigbawmcgraw

    bigbawmcgraw Alien

    That's a bit disrespectful is it not?
    Why don't you create your own game with all the things you want in it. A dozen or so Italian guys did it so it can't be that hard. :rolleyes:
    cbNXD, Dutchyfutch, nate and 8 others like this.
  8. nonnex

    nonnex Alien

    Hehe, well thats a totally new view and never has been discussed in this Forums ;)
    Guido Trampe, LeDude83 and V8_KB like this.
  9. Vítor Sousa

    Vítor Sousa Hardcore Simmer

    That is a good question. Probably not the right place to do it, as you can see by the answers you already got.

    I think there is one point that may detract Devs from doing it. How do you make people leave the service they invested so much in?
    Look at the Moba market. So many clones of LoL and Dota, and yet, only a few have a tiny fraction of the success this 2 have. Most are condemned to shut down at birth already.

    For a person that spent 100 or 200 euros in iRacing, what justifies leaving that for a new game/service, where they have to start spending the same amount? Is the different physics enough? Don't think so.
    Tim Meuris, Skylar_Schutz and TCLF like this.
  10. Riccardo

    Riccardo Racer

    obviously because it's not this phenomenally successful business model
    cbNXD, Dutchyfutch and Peter65 like this.
  11. Jynnantonix

    Jynnantonix Simracer

    Not sure why you think that's disrespectful, I'm not saying what the AC team do is easy. Just making the point that if implementing a similar service would mean the whole team working on it for 1 year +, then that's a big decision since you are taking away from your time to work on new dlc, game improvements, sequels etc. But, and this is just speculation, perhaps that kind of time is not necessary seeing as someone is already making something similar in his spare time.

    I didn't know those sales numbers Dave quoted above, so obviously it makes sense to go the route of the greatest profit. I didn't know the differences were that big.
  12. David Wright

    David Wright Hardcore Simmer

    To be fair, because iRacing is very expensive and includes a subscription element, sales numbers are not the be all and end all. An iRacing member will pay iRacing far more than an AC member will pay Kunos even if they buy all the DLC, so in terms of income things will be much closer.
    Glaurung and irfan.pratama like this.
  13. Jynnantonix

    Jynnantonix Simracer

    Yeh you're right, as this would be a very difficult decision for me as I'm about $300 in to Iracing so far, so to spend an extra $x annually on 'Assetto premium' service or whatever they'd call it would be difficult. However since there is already a very healthy AC online population, many of them would likely make the change. This in turn would likely be met with howls of protest since it would be splitting the community.

    Perhaps the best people to try something like this would be rfactor 2, since they already charge people to play their joke 'online service'. Um what service would that be? A room full of empty community servers? So if they revamped the entire thing , implemented safety rating, performance rating, scheduled races etc and upped their annual fee, they might actually succeed. No doubt it would be small to begin with, but if most people enjoy the driving experience more than Iracing's, then perhaps over time people would start 'upgrading', like we do with all other material things in life. If a new graphics card offers a better playing experience, many people will get it despite having 'invested' $x on their previous card a few years back.
  14. Turk

    Turk Alien

    I wouldn't be opposed to a premium Assetto Corsa service. I don't know how much use I'd get out of it though. The whole online competitive, ranked system is actually a huge part of what turns me off iRacing. If I get a months subscription I'd be afraid I might only use a few hours of it, I'd be worried that I'm getting in peoples way and causing rage in the better drivers around me. iRacing seems like serious business and all I want is entertainment.
  15. Minolin

    Minolin Staff Member KS Dev Team

    A pretty good question, but be prepared to get some less good answers.
    This is my try:

    I often hear this, and I think it's important to note that MP might not be (financially) significant in most race sims. Then you'll hear "but if sim X suceeds all the guys will jump in".. Might be true, might also be some kind of "if you lower the taxes people [...] and you'll end up with more tax income" (sounds good, but isn't doable mathmatically and/or in reality).

    Oh. I love that one. :D

    By chance I know somebody who is dedicating a lot of time in that topic ;) The pure programming stuff is one thing, and could be done in maybe 10 - 14 man days (assuming some client integration like a grade next to the name plate). Add 20 more days for driver profiles, shiny stuff, presentation, maybe web portals. And roughly extra 25 days until there is a common sense of "core feature completness" (~= until RCP stops to do an focused article once every week).. Disclaimer: From-outside-estimations without internal Kunos-knowledge, so don't take this too seriously.

    Add maybe 140% of testing effort for the core features. This is unusal high, but you have to take into consideration that you need a lot of "outdoor" tests with other, designated drivers. A lot of the data you have to deal with is not precise or deterministic. A slowly rolling car is not a standing car, for example. The exact point of an accident can be different for two cars just because of latency, and so on.

    But before you can start programming, you need to know exactly and in detail what you are going to do. Non-programmers usually are just astonished about the kind of thinking (and programming) we devs need. A (working) program needs to be told *everything* in *every* thinkable case. You need time to identify problems, possible solutions, side effects, interactions, details. And this particular one is salted with the one, incredible complex aspect: Psychology. Effort until you have a working system with working psychological effects: Priceless.

    So yes, it's probably doable, but it is hard, at least if it should work flawlessly. What you suggest needs even more; you suggest a core feature. You had to deliver excellence.

    Another thing you might underestimate. The work (and success) of a mod project isn't even related to the effort of professional, "official" devs. Because: Expectations and scope of actions.
    Minorating could be started as unfinished beta, everyone loved the effort. MR could change it's core model several times, including stat wipes and whatever. It could introduce a beloved feature, and just abandon it a few weeks ago. And there have been and will be bugs. Backend restarts. New plugin versions to wait for.
    I have never heard anything more negative than "the distribution isn't fair" or "I don't think it will make a difference". Why? Expectations. Lol we even got a positive PRC article about MR!

    Imagine, Kunos would have delivered MR exactly in the same quality, timeline and everything. It would probably be hated. "We need X", "this sucks", "how can they do this that way", "you can't deliver a product like this", blablabla.
    No, Kunos (or any other "official" source) would have to invest a lot more than I did, with less room to "try things".

    Because it's a very ungrateful position for every competitor. iRacing does this for years, has a huge driver community. If sim X delivers something that is 1:1 as good as iRating, very few would abandon iRacing. Yes, they would try, but also soon miss all the things they are used to, they are trained in, and even more important: People they know. You'd need to receive a critical mass of the driver base over night - not that easy to achieve (or calculate in advance).

    Edit: Obviously I'm only talking about the iRating part of the iRacing service
  16. Tberg

    Tberg Alien

    Reason #1, of a longer list, that I don´t play iRacing.
    cbNXD likes this.
  17. fbiehne

    fbiehne Hardcore Simmer

    I’d say there are more people who just want to hop in some public MP races from time to time, so why should a dev bother with building a complicated ranking- and safetyrating system? Because I think it is hard to implement and get it to work. I’m an iracing customer myself and I love their system because it creates more or less clean and fair racing and makes it more serious imo. But you have to keep in mind that our hobby is a niche and ca 50.000 iracing-customers is not much and further on they have to pay a monthly fee to use this service. Finally there is money in the background, as someone already said.
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2015
  18. Paule_NLC

    Paule_NLC Hardcore Simmer

    I think the high price of iracing makes the online experience the way it is. If you pay much money on one car model, you know why you do it. Because you want to drive this car till perfection. Then there is the rating system. You´ll drive more carefully when you know you paid lots of money and want to participate on the races you want. And don´t want to get downrated. So I think it´s depending on eachother. This means to get only good drivers on your servers you have to make it exclusiv. Exclusiv means you have to put high prices on it, so you have to think twice to spend that money. But this concept excludes modding. Because it doesn´t make sense to buy expensive cars, if you can get them for free. So the main reason, why these titles can´t compete is because they have complete differen concepts. And a mixture of both won´t work. And I´m really happy AC isn´t like iracing. ;)
  19. Quffy

    Quffy Alien

    Iracing also uses scheduled races. Users there know that each half or each hour a race will start, for example at 17:00, and other server at 17:30. So people will converge on that specific race, filling it. Correct that info if you know more, I haven't raced online in iracing.

    But lets say we have 10 rackservice servers that are maintained by them+kunos. These could be in a way that every hour a new race will start. So schedule the practice/qualify+overtime for a race to start each hour. Then put a couple servers just with the popular content, to satisfy people that want to race with that. And other servers start with half an hour gap to the other group.

    - For me, the benefit of a scheduled race against a random time is that for example: I open AC, go to Online menu and look for something to race. Then I see several servers already in Race mode, others with 15min of practice or qualify, but I just wanted to race straight away. So if I knew that each hour a certain server with the content I like will start its Race, I and possibly others would converge there at the same time to have a race. But instead everyone goes online for multiplayer whenever, but with scheduled race people will converge to the same hour. These remain public races, but at least people would know that a race will start every hour. There can also be shorter races every half an hour, without practice/qualify time, but we'd know if we want to race now, a quick race will start every half an hour, or every hour.
  20. From a competitive point of view, for sure it is. Almost all competitive simracers are there, and I'm not only talking about the aliens.
    William Levesque likes this.
  21. This.

    If you're interested in (highly)competitive racing, there isn't really any other alternative. A couple leagues scattered here and there in other sims might have some very good drivers, but nothing close to the depth you'd find in proper iRacing fields.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice