Triple Screen Discussion

then he has some HW booster.......because when i had an i7 7700K and a 1080 neither in AC1 i was achieving 65FPS with a full grid with high settings (including shadows) with 1080p triples

 

i think ac is more expensive in terms of resources then acc

 

LOL

 

in the my case it is... low settings
30 fps in ac
58 to 60 in acc

 

How often do we have to proof, that this "let's go race" video has horrorbly streched image?


https://www.assettocorsa.net/forum/...le-monitor-support.50856/page-22#post-1020048

 

https://www.unrealengine.com/en-US/...-twitter&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Some stuff on multi display with unreal.

edit: Sorry already posted

 

That doesn't sound right. You should be getting a lot higher framerate in AC than in ACC.

 

edit

 

in AC i have a less fps (50-60 and ACC 60-80)
but:
AC 6400x1080 vs 2560x1080 and AC with sol and shaders patch and so on.
Maybe @Salvatore Amato there is something similar with your config (not that you've overseen triples vs single)

 

sorry guys ac was running 1080p, here im at 720p. my mistake, I thought i decrease that also but no

 

I have attached three pictures to highlight the difference between having and not having. TripleScreen support.

In one of the pictures you see a triple monitor view using the correct FOV (for me, 29) in the lambo on Assetto Corsa.
This is at T1 if the Nürburgring GP circuit. As you can see, in the right monitor I can see the apex of the corner. The monitors are angled at 45 degrees, and I can even see outside of the RHS window and the mirror.
The picture is taken in panoramic mode: everything is in proportion.

The other two pictures show the problem and half solution in ACC:
With the monitors angled at 45 degrees, notice how stretched the image is on both side monitors. I think I am looking to my side but in actual fact, I am only being shown what’s past the windscreen: notice the absence of the RHS mirror, and look at the O’s in the Yokohama signs.

The final picture shows the half solution: push the monitors parallel to each other, and the same panoramic view now shows how the image is not stretched (looks less stretched in real life): compare the o’s in the Yokohama sign.

As you can tell, up to a point, it is useful to have the side monitors even in this limited range of view, since it shows the apex of T1 as you approach it.
But no side mirror, no side window.

Hopefully this clarifies it for all the folks who don’t have triple screens and don’t know what it does.

 

yes we need 3s support. but it should not be difficult to implement honestly. I think they will make it once they finish more imminent tasks. at what res do you have it?

 

In ACC the resolution is set to 5860x1080. In Assetto, 5760x1080.
The 100 extra pixels are required to cover the gaps between monitors in the absence of triple screen support. The thicker the monitor edge, the more pixels you need...

 

can you have another picture increasing fov in acc? I'm corious to see it at 35

 

Yep can do later tonight I think

 

As promised

 

I'm very sorry I told the opposite XD. Thank you anyway.
Next time you will be in can you decrease it to make for example to 40 or in a way to see the sides properly?
Thank you, my mistake XD

 

Sure no problem. I think you’ll find a minimum of 45 is probably required. I’ll check

 

Please also bear in mind, the higher the vFOV, the more the side monitors will warp space, and the smaller the area of focus in front of you, the net effect being an inaccurate sense of space: in forza motorsport 7 they still don’t have an adjustable FOV and triple screen is therefore worse than a single monitor.
Will try and take a video of it.