Kunos spend your money, this guy needs working with you

Dont see why AC need this sort of stuff. This is a racing game, not a demolition derby.

And I can see that this could be a potential issue with some manufacturers, they really do not like to see their cars' passenger carriage being crushed.

 

Maybe you should email the creator of that game and show him what Kunos are doing, and tell him to 'spend his money' to include AC in his game.

 

In real races the cars usually don't react like some toycars smashed against each other if they crash, so it could help to sustain the immersion during heavy crashs, however usually people try to avoid it isn't that important - like false starts . But everytime in a sim I crash it drasticly reminds me that I just play a game. Same for missing animated pitcrews, cardboard-spectators etc. that always appeared bizarre, but shouldn't be necessary in 2016.
But I would rather spent unused power for bigger grids (and the AI for those) for proper enduranceraces (Blancpain/VLN/WEC) and animated staff and crowds to increase the livelyness in races. Same for rain, which isn't as essential either IMO.

 

No thanks not needed at all.

 

No, pls?! Not from you...

 

Actually, it was a question in the last stream and Marco said that it's not the case.

 

For BeamNG soft body physic to be implemented in a race sim we need to have this:



and go to sleep to wake up when super-super-super computers are available for anyone.






I need a triple CPU i8 5960K in SLI and 4 GTX 1080 in SLI.

 

Oh, well might be. I've tried that game (it seems to be one of those notorious "Early Access" games that will never be finished) and the damage is very detailed, to the point that it's hard to see any "preset" patterns to it. And yeah I agree physical damage model is more important. In AC most important part already has detailed damage and that is the tyres. Also I find it quite impressive, that bodywork damage has aerodynamic effects.

Yeah he did: http://www.assettocorsa.net/forum/i...cat-hacked-in-s03e07.34430/page-3#post-718255

And Luca here now... seems to be a myth. I've heard that so many times during the years, in different games. Maybe it was something players alleged, or something some developer used as excuse years ago and it started to live on.

 

That´s called racing.

 

I'd be happy if the damage model was at least up to par with iRacing. That's something which is really good in that sim, i found (at least the kind of damage you get from the contacts, not so much the damage model itself). Obviously, manufacturer who let you license their cars don't want a damage model though, at least that's what i gathered. Shame.

 

Do you really expect people to read before they hit "post reply"?
It's internet, ain't nobody got time fo dat.

 

It is the same reason why devs tell people that we can only see 24-30 fps and/or it is cinematic, so people stop complaining and bothering them about it.

 

Ffb might not be the strongest point but after dial in some settings is not bad with a g27 and for physics you get pretty decent ones, you can even drift and setup the car like any other sim. Is not the most user friendly game but version 0.6.1 is pretty good

Sent using Tapatalk

 

Aye! That's good to hear. Nice kitten btw.

 

If I remember correctly beamNG doesn't have licensed contet while AC has...not goona stack together so simply xD

 

That would be a perfect example of wrong priorities. Spend 30% of the CPU and a bunch of cash on a feature that we try to avoid 99% of the time playing the game.

 

That means that Kazunori Yamauchi has been lying to us for years when he answered questions about damage or lack thereof in Gran Turismo.

With technical issue, you mean that the hardware (pc) aren't fast and powerful enough?

 

What did he say was the reason for the audio sample not changing since gt1, they could at least have gone and recorded a dyson to get the more modern feel to their car sounds.

 

Polyphony will have the last laugh, if there is no petrol anymore and electric cars will reign.