Assetto Corsa Competizione - Generic discussion

Fair enough. Personally I think Kunos should just keep going the way they are. A build every month or so.. Iron out the bugs and move on. The community around here is going to have a meltdown in around one months time

 

@pankykapus

haha the Panky padlock is back out in full force

Anti-Bullsh!t-System

 

Maybe a minor detail in terms of simulation but i noticed that in thunthestorm scenarios when you can hear thunders shocking they are not in any way graphically represented in the sky or in screen flashing.

 

Wow... I tried the Jag and I want to start a petition to rename its safe setup to understeer fest
Plus who homologated the 1st gear must have been the same gearbox guy from Ferrari. Probably is now sweeping the workshop

 

Thanks for these, I've actually tried it on my living room system which has a 9700k & rtx 2080ti and I can get 55 fps upwards with everything on its highest setting at 4k with maximum amount of cars on the track.

This has lead me to believe that my driving simulator is under powered for this game with its cpu, I say this as time trial, practice and playing with only a couple of other cars on the track, the game plays quite well on a minimum of high settings as I'm getting over 100 fps on a resolution of 3840 x 1080 on a samsung chg90 as I only have an i5 7400 running in it. The gtx 1080ti is fine but for high but I think the amount of cars is too much for the cpu.

Has a minimum spec been mention yet?

 

I believe most races are red flagged if lightning is striking within 5 miles of the tracks properly lines. So ambient flashes (no actual bolts) with delayed thunder would be really authentic. But you do need some kind of flash in a storm at night at least.

 

With a 9700K ? I don't think so. It's a i7, did you activate hyperthreading ?

 

I seem to have not explained myself well, I'll try again.

Living room pc: Intel core I7 9700k, nvidia rtx 2080ti, 16GB 3000mhz ddr 4 ram @3840x2160 giving me a minimum 50fps plus at the absolute highest settings other than resolution scaling which is at 100 percent.

This is with maximum cars on track so pretty much the most difficult other than rain which I never have in.

This is more than acceptable as I would only need to reduce one or two settings to get a locked 60fps.

What I'm having trouble with is with my driving simulator pc which is an Intel core i5 7400, nvidia gtx 1080ti, 16GB, 3000mhz ddr4 ram and the game is installed on a ssd @3840x1080.

I get quite good fps on ultra at around 60 to 80 fps so I've been playing on high settings which around 100 fps on practice or time trial.

Excellent so far.... But if I play the game on my simulator on race with maximum cars it says 80 fps using steam fps counter but it looks around 5fps.

If I reduce the amount of cars in the race it runs okay.

Even if I run on the lowest graphics settings with maximum cars on track it still looks to be 5fps.

Let me know if any of what I wrote makes sense or doesn't make sense

 

Looks like you run into the CPU limit with the physics calculation of the cars. Would have little to do with the settings, just the amount of cars.
Still i5 7400 shouldn´t perform so bad as to drop to 5 fps. I run an i5 7600K and was having some slight stutter only at the green flag with 28 AI.

 

don't want to open a new thread, so will post here:
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/microsoft-update-ruins-gaming-performance,38761.html

is it possible that ACC is affected by this?

 

Curious. Why do some MP servers have no ping rate?

 

A question to any RTX 2080ti users with either a 4k or 21:9 3440x1440 setup. What sort of FPS are you getting with mostly High/Epic settings? I am seriously considering a 49" 32:9 monitor however the current 1080p 144hz version will be upgraded to a 1440p 120hz version mid of this year therefor it will be 5.5 million pixels to render. A little more than 21:9 however considerably lower than 4k. I am hoping to achieve 120 FPS in a practice session with High/Epic settings. Do you think this is achievable? I will also upgrade to a i7 8700k - 32GB DDR4 - Z390 MB.

4K = 8.3 million pixels
32:9 1440p = 5.5 million pixels
21:9 1440p = 4.9 million pixels
32:9 1080p = 4.1 million pixels
16:9 1080p = 2.2 million pixels

 

I got rtx 2080 and i5 6600k clocked to 4.5GHz
My screen is 3440x1440 ultrawide and when i got all setting maxed out i get around 70-85 fps on multiplayer, don't race against ai much but when settings are maxed out with 20 AI on track at the beginning im getting like 50 frames but once the race gets going it goes up to 70.

 

Good to know @B0gies. I was more interested in the rtx 2080 ti performance. Nonetheless thank you for the feedback.

 

It’s a forum, called « General discussion ». Some guy comes and ask a simple question wether a feature will be here or not and he is instantly censored without any answer...
It would cost less energy just giving a clear answer « Not really, it will be the same as AC » then lock the thread to close the debate but let it be just for info.

By the way, searching the subject on the forum we can find there was a time people could do more than whislists :
https://www.assettocorsa.net/forum/...and-mechanical-damage-poll.49303/#post-964041

 

@Coanda , RTx2080ti @1850/7500 - i9 9900k @4.9 - 16gb 3000. 4k 100% ss All settings at max inc. mirror,no blur. Stock Nvidia settings
Not done any imperical testing after the update, but was running a full field of ai at Monza 7pm, don't think it dropped below 60fps.
4k is about 1.5x more pixels than you want to run so presume that would give you about 90fps min.

 

@Turbo_Dad - That is great news for me! Thank you. 20 Ai is FPS killer at the moment and Nighttime also impacts FPS more than wet weather. Looking good to achieve my desired 120 FPS in practice FPS. 90 FPS in extreme scenarios is fine by me & am sure Kunos will make the Ai less taxing. Happy days

 

Ran fraps to confirm:
Frames: 4168 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 69.467 - Min: 63 - Max: 79
Frames: 4285 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 71.417 - Min: 62 - Max: 79
starting 29th as above post

 

@Turbo_Dad - ops I made a mistake. The new version also has horizontal pixel increase so the new resolution will be 32:9 @ 5120×1440 @ 120hz making it 7.4 million pixels. hmm might be hard to achieve 120 FPS. At least your getting over 60 FPS on your 4k extreme scenario.

4K = 8.3 million pixels
32:9 1440p = 7.4 million pixels
21:9 1440p = 4.9 million pixels
32:9 1080p = 4.1 million pixels
16:9 1080p = 2.2 million pixels

 

Think you might need to double up on the 2080ti for that ! even then... eek

2am night time run 28ai
Frames: 3494 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 58.233 - Min: 52 - Max: 65
Frames: 3547 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 59.117 - Min: 53 - Max: 68

Pretty taxing stuff