1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties. If you report a crash, ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Crashes" folder in the same directory. Do not post "I have the same issue" in an existing thread with a game crash, always open your own thread. Do not PM developers and staff members for personal troubleshooting and support.
  2. As part of our continuous maintenance and improvements to Assetto Corsa Competizione we will be releasing small updates on a regular basis during the esports season which might not go through the usual announcement process detailing the changes until a later version update where these changes will be listed retrospectively.
  3. If ACC doesn't start with an error or the executable is missing, please add your entire Steam directory to the exceptions in your antivirus software, run a Steam integrity check or reinstall the game altogether. Make sure you add the User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione folder to your antivirus/Defender exceptions and exclude it from any file sharing app (GDrive, OneDrive or Dropbox)! The Corsair iCue software is also known to conflict with Input Device initialization, if the game does not start up and you have such devices, please try disabling the iCue software and try again. [file:unknown] [line: 95] secure crt: invalid error is a sign of antivirus interference, while [Pak chunk signing mismatch on chunk] indicates a corrupted installation that requires game file verification.
  4. When reporting an issue with saved games, please always zip and attach your entire User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione/Savegame folder, along with the logs and the crash folder (when reporting related to a crash).
ACC general support Note about silent updates Startup troubleshooting ACC savegame reports

Benchmark results, food for thought

Discussion in 'Chit Chat Room' started by Lino Carreira, Oct 22, 2015.

Page 17 of 26
  1. V8_KB

    V8_KB Alien

    **Wall of text**

    So I finally upgraded my old but still not that bad Saphire HD 7850. It was a great card considering what I paid for it and the fact that it's still able to run (on low settings mostly) new games @ 60FPS is amazing. It was running @ 1100MHz for over 3 years, so almost 30% more than stock (860) and never had any issues with it. Temps never higher than 65C even in summer when it's terribly hot, noise level also acceptable at highest 50% fan speed that it was running during really hottest days. The one downside of my old 7850 is 1gb of VRAM and it was causing FPS drops on Nordschleife with bigger grid.

    At first I was looking forward to RX480, when they released it I turned my head towards the GTX 1060. But since there are still issues with availability here and I came across a great deal for a new GTX 970 I simply bought that one. It's a Strix OC version, I just got my hands on it so quickly ran some benchmarks and didn't have time to OC further than Asus did.

    Here are some comparisons of 7850 1GB and GTX 970.

    My "racing" settings that I was using till today. The difference is that 7850 always was at ~980MB of VRAM usage and 970 nicely showed that it's not enough by using 1600MB on the same settings.

    HD 7850:
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 14904
    FPS: AVG=101 MIN=19 MAX=127 VARIANCE=3 CPU=66%

    LOADING TIME: 18s
    GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:4X SHDW:512 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 2 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0
    GTX 970:
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 17797
    FPS: AVG=121 MIN=57 MAX=145 VARIANCE=3 CPU=63%

    LOADING TIME: 35s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:4X SHDW:512 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 2 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0
    1920x1080 | Single screen | Fullscreen rendering - on | VSync - off | Framerate limit - off | Aniso - 4x | AA samples - 2x | World detail - medium | Shadows - low | Smoke - very low | Smoke in mirrors - off | PP effects - on | Overall effect quality - high | Glare quality - high | DoF - off | Saturation - 100% | Motion blur - off | Crepuscular rays - on | Heat shimmering - off | FXAA - off | Mirror resulotion - normal | HQ mirror - off | Reflection quality - low | Reflection rendering frequency - very low


    Here is a comparison on higher settings:
    HD 7850:
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 4486
    FPS: AVG=30 MIN=5 MAX=95 VARIANCE=1 CPU=26%

    LOADING TIME: 18s
    GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    GTX 970:
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 16191
    FPS: AVG=110 MIN=63 MAX=129 VARIANCE=2 CPU=66%

    LOADING TIME: 18s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    1920x1080 | Single screen | Fullscreen rendering - on | VSync - off | Framerate limit - off | Aniso - 16x | AA samples - 4x | World detail - maximum | Shadows - ultra | Smoke - normal | Smoke in mirrors - on | PP effects - on | Overall effect quality - ultra | Glare quality - ultra | DoF - off | Saturation - 100% | Motion blur - off | Crepuscular rays - on | Heat shimmering - on | FXAA - off | Mirror resulotion - high | HQ mirror - on | Reflection quality - medium | Reflection rendering frequency - low
    FPS difference wasn't really big in comparison of "race" settings but in this case the difference is massive. Almost 4x more AVG FPS on the 970.


    And everything turned on max, including reflections but only on 970 for obvious reasons :D:
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 9029
    FPS: AVG=61 MIN=39 MAX=80 VARIANCE=0 CPU=38%

    LOADING TIME: 18s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:12
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:5
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1


    Conclusion is that it's a damn big upgrade and I'm very happy. :)
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2016
    V8_KB, Aug 19, 2016
    #321
    Jack Bancroft and liakjim like this.
  2. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    It was a smart move - a 970 is plenty enough for a single screen and if it was a good deal it makes perfect sense.

    I just bought a 1070 and I had the same experience as you: when testing the old settings with the 1070 I got only ~95 --> 120 FPS, which seemed a bit weak. Then I cranked the GFX settings and the FPS with 1070 stayed around 100 whereas the previous card would have gone down big time. I suppose that the CPU limits the fFPS on low settings but if you crank everything that stresses the GPU the new one will shine.
     
    LeDude83, Aug 19, 2016
    #322
    V8_KB likes this.
  3. demetri

    demetri Hardcore Simmer

    One interesting thing I got from @V8_KB post is that with initial settings 970 produced more 20% fps than 7850 with 3% lower CPU usage. I think that follows the pattern that I noticed a while ago that people with AMD GPUs usually reported higher CPU usage in AC benchmark. Probably means that AMD drivers are more CPU-hungry than their nVidia counterparts, which is not good for this CPU-intensive game
     
    demetri, Aug 19, 2016
    #323
  4. stephen_b

    stephen_b Racer

    Just a little test run with my new GTX 1080 - overclocked to around 2.1ghz on the core. Max settings.

    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 16529
    FPS: AVG=112 MIN=55 MAX=139 VARIANCE=0 CPU=55%

    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:5
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:12
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    CPU CORES: 12
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 (1920x1080)
    LOADING TIME: 16s
     
    stephen_b, Aug 21, 2016
    #324
  5. AlleyViper

    AlleyViper Alien

    That's usual, but V8's benchmarks were done on under W7 while AMD drivers on W10 have better DX11 CPU overhead, being able to produce more draw calls. AC would have benefited from it. Also, there was constant vram swapping implied which could stress the CPU more.
     
    Last edited: Aug 21, 2016
    AlleyViper, Aug 21, 2016
    #325
  6. AlleyViper

    AlleyViper Alien

    1.8 brings some impressive performance results on my main Phenom II x4. Unfortunately I don't have the older bench file, but it was doing about 76fps (about ~68% CPU usage for render thread) at 3.96GHz with same 16.8.2 driver and 7970 @1020/1405 (only 1.050v ASIC), now it's:

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 16130
    FPS: AVG=110 MIN=19 MAX=140 VARIANCE=3 CPU=91%

    LOADING TIME: 20s
    GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900 Series (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:8X SHDW:2048 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    It's a crazy 44% increase on a 6 year old model CPU. Finally since 1.6, CPU render thread usage is back to >80% instead of lagging behind with low fps.

    Edit: At a less power hungry OC at 3.7GHz (stock voltage), it went from 72 to 104fps avg. On both cases min values at start seem lower, though. It was usually about ~29-34, now it's 19-23fps.
    Settings were always the game's default (the settings as AC will recreate if you delete your own video.ini in the Documents folder) + vsynch and 60fps cap for gameplay.
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2016
    AlleyViper, Aug 26, 2016
    #326
  7. Znam Neznam

    Znam Neznam Hardcore Simmer

    Just ran benchmark.
    Specs in signature.

    Slight bump in performance. Probably due to more CPU usage.



    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 12832
    FPS: AVG=87 MIN=20 MAX=121 VARIANCE=5 CPU=76%

    AC VERSION: 1.7.1 (x64)
    POINTS: 12418
    FPS: AVG=84 MIN=29 MAX=121 VARIANCE=10 CPU=72%
     
    Last edited: Aug 26, 2016
    Znam Neznam, Aug 26, 2016
    #327
  8. V8_KB

    V8_KB Alien

    Great improvement in 1.8 regarding FPS if you ask me.

    I did 3 benchmarks in 1.7.5 today, on the same settings. Did 3 of them to see how the results will differ.

    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 16092
    FPS: AVG=109 MIN=53 MAX=131 VARIANCE=1 CPU=64%

    LOADING TIME: 26s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 16757
    FPS: AVG=114 MIN=61 MAX=132 VARIANCE=2 CPU=66%

    LOADING TIME: 17s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 16604
    FPS: AVG=113 MIN=60 MAX=131 VARIANCE=1 CPU=66%

    LOADING TIME: 17s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    And 1.8 below, only two tests, since you know... I want to drive now. ;)
    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 19021
    FPS: AVG=129 MIN=54 MAX=183 VARIANCE=10 CPU=77%

    LOADING TIME: 17s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 19007
    FPS: AVG=129 MIN=63 MAX=183 VARIANCE=10 CPU=77%

    LOADING TIME: 17s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    Settings are the same as in the sig, but I'll paste them too.

    Display | 1920x1080 | Single screen | Fullscreen rendering - on | VSync - off | Framerate limit - off | Aniso - 16x | AA samples - 4x | World detail - maximum | Shadows - ultra | Effects | Smoke - very low | Smoke in mirrors - off | PP effects - on | Overall effect quality - ultra | Glare quality - ultra | DoF - off | Saturation - 100% | Motion blur - off | Crepuscular rays - on | Heat shimmering - on | FXAA - on | Reflections | Mirror resulotion - high | HQ mirror - off | Reflection quality - medium | Reflection rendering frequency - medium

    Although it's true about AMD drivers being heavier on CPU, I ran benchmarks only one time with each settings. As you can see in results from this post there's 2% difference between the first bench and the next one. Not suggesting anything like that there's no difference between AMD and nV, just saying that I did them one time and it would be best to do at least two times (preferably 3) to get the average.
     
    V8_KB, Aug 26, 2016
    #328
  9. Andrew_WOT

    Andrew_WOT Alien

    Somehow my system did not respond to performance improvement well.
    Everything is essentially the same


    C VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 11055
    FPS: AVG=75 MIN=61 MAX=87 VARIANCE=1 CPU=34%

    LOADING TIME: 13s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (3840x2160)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 12
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 10950
    FPS: AVG=74 MIN=63 MAX=86 VARIANCE=0 CPU=36%

    LOADING TIME: 13s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (3840x2160)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 12
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
     
    Andrew_WOT, Aug 26, 2016
    #329
  10. bzucobzuco

    bzucobzuco Hardcore Simmer

    with your graphics card and 4k res. and very high shadows you can not expect some improvements in fps. 1.8 brings better CPU optimization. In solo play or very high graphics settings there is no improvements in fps.
     
    bzucobzuco, Aug 26, 2016
    #330
  11. luxxx797

    luxxx797 Simracer

    Nice improvement here:


    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 12703
    FPS: AVG=86 MIN=54 MAX=105 VARIANCE=2 CPU=72%

    LOADING TIME: 53s
    GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:2 DOF:1 RAYS:0 HEAT:0




    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 13747
    FPS: AVG=93 MIN=21 MAX=129 VARIANCE=5 CPU=81%

    LOADING TIME: 25s
    GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:2 RAYS:0 HEAT:0
     
    luxxx797, Aug 26, 2016
    #331
  12. rd.king

    rd.king Hardcore Simmer

    According to the benchmark numbers I took a slight hit in FPS.
    But the overall performance is up considerably with 1.8.
    I can't really understand why my CPU is being under utilized.
    and although I have all the GPU I should ever need for this game my FPS is not that high.

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 10120
    FPS: AVG=69 MIN=29 MAX=101 VARIANCE=2 CPU=40%
    LOADING TIME: 19s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (2715x1527)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 8
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:5
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:0 DOF:5 RAYS:0 HEAT:0
     
    rd.king, Aug 27, 2016
    #332
  13. Mumaransa

    Mumaransa Gamer

    Nice improvement here too. Now i can try adding a bit of eye candy to my beloved 120fps@120Hz

    AC VERSION: 1.7.5 (x64)
    POINTS: 21151
    FPS: AVG=144 MIN=77 MAX=175 VARIANCE=3 CPU=64%

    LOADING TIME: 32s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:16X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 4 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:0 HEAT:0


    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 26025
    FPS: AVG=177 MIN=59 MAX=210 VARIANCE=2 CPU=78%

    LOADING TIME: 12s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:16X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 4 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:0 HEAT:0
     
    Mumaransa, Aug 27, 2016
    #333
  14. f_deutsch

    f_deutsch Hardcore Simmer

    Amazing performance improvement. I do not use PP but the even I raised some quality levels I still get about 30fps average. Remarkable work Kunos, way to go !

    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.7.4 (x64)
POINTS: 19086
FPS: AVG=130 MIN=56 MAX=157 VARIANCE=4 CPU=65%

LOADING TIME: 18s
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:2048 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 3 SMOKE:1
PP: QLT:3 HDR:0 FXAA:1 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
POINTS: 23243
FPS: AVG=158 MIN=80 MAX=198 VARIANCE=6 CPU=83%

LOADING TIME: 15s
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:2048 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
PP: QLT:5 HDR:0 FXAA:1 GLR:3 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
     
    f_deutsch, Aug 27, 2016
    #334
  15. Kubr0

    Kubr0 Racer

    hey AlleyViper!!!

    as promised, I'm back with a result too. Now I don't have the full details here now since I @my laptop, but went from 16k score to 21k score from previous version to v1.8. Its completely NUTS in this v1.8, I'm for the first time able to enjoy fluid 60FPS since the first second of the race (actually, the first few seconds have been always very heavy on my PC and it stuttered a lot). My mind was blown away, now I got an avg. fps of 130 and both average and minimum FPS got increased by 20-30FPS with the same settings as before (actually, everything cranked up except the reflections).

    finally we have the optimization for old CPUs we've been looking for! Happy racing! ;)
     
    Kubr0, Aug 27, 2016
    #335
    AlleyViper likes this.
  16. AlleyViper

    AlleyViper Alien

    Great to see your GTX970 coming alive too!

    It's almost the same here, for grid starts and T1/T2 are much more fluid against AI. In the worst case scenarios when starting from the back in a near-all different cars 16 grid, it's still in the mid 50's range instead of dropping to 40's or high 30's in Barcelona.
    The same performance boost can be seen on Nords Tourist servers when there are >24 players. Before it'd drop to ~43-52 when cruising the track, now it's nearly at 60fps all the time, except for some ~55 dips when crossing the parking lot. I still get a few occasional physics late frames due to my slower CPU (now it shows on the render stats, it's not needed to look at the log.txt), but at least my (also aging) GPU has much better use. Next month I'll be able to test on the slower PhII at 3.6GHz (with also much lower RAM speed, and a bit less NB than the sig one) and a HD7870 from were the benchmarks came in our previous discussion.

    Only downside graphics wise I notice in this patch, it's a shadow pop on trees at long distance that seems a bit more noticeable in tracks like Spa (placebo?). Some users also complained about some ugly shadow pattern/crawling at much closer distance than I see at High, but they all had NV cards.
    Enjoy!
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2016
    AlleyViper, Aug 27, 2016
    #336
    Kubr0 likes this.
  17. Kubr0

    Kubr0 Racer

    noticed the very same + the difference being on the tourist layout with full 32 pits is crazy :D 60fps in any situation now ...
     
    Kubr0, Aug 27, 2016
    #337
  18. Andrew_WOT

    Andrew_WOT Alien

    Huge food for thoughts. Impact of PP filters in 1.8

    Natural OEM PP and Weather files
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
POINTS: 9649
FPS: AVG=65 MIN=56 MAX=74 VARIANCE=0 CPU=33%

LOADING TIME: 15s
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (3840x2160)
OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 12
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    Natural Mod PP with Been Li + WagnumPI Clouds
    Natural Graphic Mod From ears1991

    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
POINTS: 11001
FPS: AVG=75 MIN=62 MAX=86 VARIANCE=0 CPU=36%

LOADING TIME: 13s
GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (3840x2160)
OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 12
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    From 65 to 75 fps with this change alone. 15% jump. :eek:

    Why can't Kunos just incorporate this filter as OEM if it performs and looks better.
     
    Last edited: Aug 27, 2016
    Andrew_WOT, Aug 27, 2016
    #338
  19. Gomoto

    Gomoto Rookie

    The 970 is a great card for 4k racing! (368.69 Driver, the newest driver looses 30% FPS on 970/980).

    Intel I5 2500k@42x
    970 core@1512 mem@4099

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 10869
    FPS: AVG=74 MIN=43 MAX=89 VARIANCE=0 CPU=40%

    LOADING TIME: 14s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (3840x2160)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:4X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 4 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:3 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0
     
    Gomoto, Aug 27, 2016
    #339
  20. Gomoto

    Gomoto Rookie

    The 970 runs even better with World Detail 5:

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 10718
    FPS: AVG=73 MIN=50 MAX=92 VARIANCE=0 CPU=40%

    LOADING TIME: 13s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (3840x2160)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:4X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:3 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0

    Lets increase AF:

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 10291
    FPS: AVG=70 MIN=42 MAX=80 VARIANCE=0 CPU=38%

    LOADING TIME: 13s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (3840x2160)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:3 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0

    even further:

    AC VERSION: 1.8 (x64)
    POINTS: 9817
    FPS: AVG=66 MIN=5 MAX=133 VARIANCE=0 CPU=36%

    LOADING TIME: 13s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (3840x2160)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:3 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0

    (Min 5 is no problem, only at startup, during gameplay it stays > 60 FPS)
     
    Gomoto, Aug 28, 2016
    #340
Page 17 of 26
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
ACC Hardware Discussions Radeon RX 5700 (XT) Users - Please Share Your Benchmark Results Jul 9, 2019
Graphics and Models/Tracks Bugs & Issues Weird FPS and benchmark results with different shadow res settings? Sep 7, 2016
ACC Hardware Discussions Benchmark mode Feb 28, 2022
ACC Virtual Reality Lets benchmark the new hardware for ACC VR Nov 21, 2020
ACC Hardware Discussions Ryzen 5 5600X + RTX 3080 Benchmark Videos Nov 5, 2020
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Can't Start a Race or a Benchmark [BitDefender/Antivirus blocking acs.exe] Dec 30, 2019
Troubleshooting - Workarounds MAIN_T at 95, gpu usage low, benchmark at 50 fps (previousli 130ish) Nov 20, 2019
ACC Screenshots & Videos Assetto Corsa Competizione - Benchmark - Nvidia RTX 2060 (i7 9700k) 1080p Apr 24, 2019
ACC Hardware Discussions The ACC CPU Benchmark Thread Dec 7, 2018
ACC Hardware Discussions The ACC GPU Benchmark Thread Nov 23, 2018
ACC Hardware Discussions The ACC Benchmark Thread Nov 18, 2018
ACC Hardware Discussions ACC benchmark tool ? Aug 5, 2018
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Can't play races or launch benchmarks Mar 24, 2018
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Can't launch races or benchmark Feb 18, 2018
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Benchmark displays HD Graphics 4000 whereas I have a GPU Oct 15, 2017

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice