Game stock car

Barrichello destroying your theories here

 

AC is definitely natural. I had a few track friends who don't play sims come over and try AC on my setup. Aside from difference in speed sensation you don't get in sims, they had it down very quickly. Within a few laps they were catching slides and pulling decent lap times once they learned the track. They were pleasantly surprised how real AC felt to real life compared to their experience trying sims in the past.

GSCE doesn't feel great to me at all, but I'm going to chalk that up to not having things configured optimally since so many people here swear by it.

 

Can't watch that from work, but read my 'rephrased' post again please.

 

First thank you for sharing this, always a pleasure to see and hear Ruben, a great driver and a very nice men.
Nice also to realize that he can perceive the difference between different brand of tyres using a G27, you might not need a super wheel to really get a good feeling of what a SIM is communicating after all.
Lastly, having a Brazilian hero saying praise about a Brazilian game, is predictable but still shows that if it is good enough for him, who are we to say that it is not worthy of our interest.

 

The modern brazilian stock cars are nice to drive in the game. The cars can be compared somehow to the mclaren 12c gt3. But still like more the 12c gt3, is more exciting.

 

After reading quite a few guys feel that rF2 has superior Physics, I went and purchased a year membership to give it a whirl for myself. Well 6 hours later (2 3hr sessions) I cant for the LIFE of me get my motion profile ANY where close to what i have in AC. Yes im not on a Commercial Motion rig, but my software is used by a Large community and it sure as heck isn't the plugins fault. It boils down to the sheer telemetry data being fed out. @David Dominguez , I know you are well aware of the current Physics calculation issues AC has, Well the exact same issues that have shown their ugly head here, are also found on the rF2 telemetry, The INSANE heave, Surge and Sway spikes you get from Touching the grass or Riding a particular kerb is Far worse in rF2 than it is in AC. YES AC isn't perfect and might lack some of the technical data compared to rf2, but overall the Feeling of said data isn't any where close to the quality of AC.

I also spoke to quite a few of my Motion buddies (whom all have different setup's hardware wise) Everyone essentially confirmed what i was feeling, and with Not a single one of them preferring rf2 over AC, so that paints a pretty clear picture for me, rF2 just ins't for me or my rig.

FFB option's felt very minimal in the options and some of the mods had Horrendous feeling to them.(wont name names)

 

What you can see in this video you can do in AC and cant doo in GSC. See the correction in the last corner in a openwheel 3.5 V12 car?



I need to say more?

 

Here is someone preferring rF2 over AC for motion sim.

Maybe you can't, but others can.

 

He doesn´t run gsc just because its made in brazil, it has more to do with the league he races, "gtrbrasil" was a simbin league since its begining, when Barrichello started simracing they still used race07 (Massa did some races about this time too). After years waiting for grt3 they finally moved to gsc in 12 or 13.

And besides Rubens there are lots of other real life drivers competing there, you could race the defending FTruck or Stock Car champion directly.

 

Speak for yourself.

 

So in terms of simulation, physics, better feelings with the wheel...

Which one is better, AC or Game Stock Car Extreme?

http://game-stockcar.com.br/?lang=en

http://www.game-automobilista.com/

Because in another forum, people says that GSCE has worse graphics but better simulation.

 

Automobilista

 

Definitely. That feeling when you crank up the FFB, put your gloves on, start the ignition and start the engine, crank up the audio because it sounds bloody awesome even in idle, head on track and come back all sweaty and exhausted knowing this is the real sh*t. So yeah, AMS for me currently

Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk

 

Ditto.......I`m loving it

 

Yeah, driving in AMS definitely carries greater intensity despite the graphic differences IMO; the sounds add tons to that but, other details in FFB, gearbox behavior and drive-train flex are ingredients that seem to be working together in harmony. Those are things that are hard to come by in most racing titles, let alone being so nicely tuned to work together.

 

its rfactor mod is all it is.

 

I installed the demo of rFactor 2 a few weeks ago, just to see/feel for myself and AMS or GSCE is absolutely NOT rFactor 2.

Besides that: Why there are so many people only dealing in absolutes?
I own a few racing games; some "sims", some "simcade titles" and even a few "arcade racers".
Every game - yeah, they're all games - has its strengths and weaknesses. There is no need for me to decide which of them is THE game. I play them all. Some of them I like to play more often but that's not a reason to bash on the other titles.

 

Im sorry, but i have to say, the feeling of the V8 Stock Cars are that, what i hope for the GT3 in Assetto.
Theyre more directly and you can feel every mistake and wrong situations.
AMS going to add DX11 and i think, it will be the rFactor2, for that all have waiting.

 

Why isnt this thread merged with the one about AMS? As far as I know its the same game but updated?

@kevin.maatman

 

I feel like that's over-stating things a bit in regard to it being the rF2 but, it will include some similar features, in particular - the dynamic road aspects.

I think they are evolving the title in a sort of tier fashion; focusing on core-feature updates now and then bringing in a new graphics engine next year.