1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties.
    Dismiss Notice

The ACC GPU Benchmark Thread

Discussion in 'ACC General Discussions' started by LeDude83, Nov 23, 2018.

  1. Jack0

    Jack0 Rookie

    Wow, my little Fury X and this game don't wanna get friends^^

    ACC 0.3.5
    CPU: i7-4790k @4000MHz
    GPU: Radeon R9 Fury X
    RAM: 16GB DDR3 @ 1866MHz

    2018-11-27 10:58:17 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 1671 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 27.850 - Min: 21 - Max: 40

    also did the test with 2560x1080p since i have a 3440x1440 monitor:
    2018-11-27 11:05:14 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 1524 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 25.400 - Min: 21 - Max: 34

    didn't really expect that, 1/3 more pixels but im loosing only 9% FPS

    With these Graphic settings i can imagine that the game is really looking good^^



    EDIT:
    Did one more test with changed Windows settings because it tapped out when i started the benchmark.
    Fullscreen: OFF

    2018-11-27 11:32:07 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 2433 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 40.550 - Min: 29 - Max: 61
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2018
    LeDude83 likes this.
  2. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien


    I updated post 1 using your test run as per the rules.

    BTW I can't reproduce the FPS gain when using windowed mode. Can you reproduce it?

    I think something is properly wrong with your system at the moment. From everything we have learned about AMD vs. NVIDIA performance, your GPU should achieve about 50 FPS or a few more in this benchmark. Is it running at proper clock speeds?!?
     
  3. Jack0

    Jack0 Rookie

    Did some tests, i had one with an average of 58,917FPS, but i can't get that again.
    Usually i get ~42 FPS average, with OC to 1100MHz i got 45 FPS.

    Im running the card without oc, especially in ue4 i have problems when im going over 1100MHz (yet, i have no idea why)
     
  4. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Ok I'll remove your result from the table in the next update. Let me know when you have sorted out that issue. Your AVG of ~42 is with Fullscreen = Off?
     
  5. Jack0

    Jack0 Rookie

    No thats with Fullscreen on, all settings as you wrote in op ;)
     
  6. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    K thanks. Please post the min max avg numbers of one of those runs for me to add it to the table.
     
  7. Jack0

    Jack0 Rookie

    2018-11-27 14:29:01 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 2553 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 42.550 - Min: 29 - Max: 65
     
  8. MakeMeLaugh

    MakeMeLaugh Gamer

    FX8350
    GTX 1070
    16GB ram

    2018-11-27 17:07:22 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 2873 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 47.883 - Min: 20 - Max: 69

    No idea how the other guys had much better performance. Also, for this test, no changes should be made on the NV settings, as it changes the graphics. But still, no idea why the performance is so different.

    EDIT: Well, for some reason FRAPS is the reason my fps is so low, without fraps it's much better. Will update with more information soon.

    Test done using MSI Afterburner. No overclocks.

    27-11-2018, 17:27:53 AC2-Win64-Shipping.exe benchmark completed, 4155 frames rendered in 64.109 s
    Average framerate : 64.8 FPS
    Minimum framerate : 49.5 FPS
    Maximum framerate : 99.6 FPS
    1% low framerate : 46.2 FPS
    0.1% low framerate : 40.5 FPS
     
    Last edited: Nov 27, 2018
    LeDude83 likes this.
  9. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Interesting. I can't reproduce that. Here's a fresh run with FRAPS:

    2018-11-28 10:19:49 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 3585 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 59.750 - Min: 46 - Max: 87

    And here's a fresh run with Afterburner:
    28-11-2018, 10:15:42 AC2-Win64-Shipping.exe benchmark completed, 3815 frames rendered in 65.891 s
    Average framerate : 57.8 FPS
    Minimum framerate : 45.4 FPS
    Maximum framerate : 78.8 FPS
    1% low framerate : 45.4 FPS
    0.1% low framerate : 43.6 FPS

    The Afterburner numbers are a tad lower because the tool took control over the GPU settings (which is why I use FRAPS for the benchmark) and changed the power levels.

    Other than that, I can see no difference between these benchmark results.

    Feel free to use Afterburner, though, as long as the run is about 60 s long.
     
  10. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Post 1 updated.

    @MakeMeLaugh your GPU still underperforms a bit - dunno what's going on there. I don't really think FRAPS caused the problem. Afterburner takes control over your GPU clocks, power management and fans. Can you try with AB active and benchmark with FRAPS at the same time?

    @Jack0 maybe try using Afterburner and see if your result improves, too.
     
  11. Ni-MH

    Ni-MH Gamer

    AMD Ryzen 5 2600
    Nvidia Geforce 1060 6GB
    16 GB Ram 3200 Mhz

    2018-11-28 14:34:53 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 3099 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 51.650 - Min: 34 - Max: 84
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  12. MakeMeLaugh

    MakeMeLaugh Gamer

    Fraps was fine today, don't know why. Was getting similar results, then turned on threaded optimization. Overall it's the same with a slightly higher max fps.

    2018-11-28 11:27:01 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 3837 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 63.950 - Min: 48 - Max: 103

    It really depends if the other users changed anything in the nvidia control panel as you can force some graphic settings. Also I'd say the version of their 1070 can also have an impact. Mine is a 1070 Galax Mini.
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  13. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Post 1 updated.

    @Jack0 your result does actually fit in. Fury X has 980 potential but performs a bit below 970. Same as with all other AMDs in here compared to their direct competitors.
     
    Jack0 likes this.
  14. Jynnantonix

    Jynnantonix Simracer

    2018-11-28 17:54:10 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 3845 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 64.083 - Min: 48 - Max: 91

    i5-4670k
    Vega64
    12GB RAM

    Now I'm regretting not going for a 1080ti instead. :( Got 3 freesync monitors though so pretty much locked in to AMD. Just gotta stay positive AMD gets a driver update for ACC I guess.
     
  15. LeDude83

    LeDude83 Alien

    Hahaha I'm in the same camp :-D

    I have a support ticket open with AMD regarding a driver optimized for ACC. My hopes aren't too high but yeah...maybe we get lucky. Hopefully Kunos can pull some nice tricks for optimization, too.

    But Freesync is a very soft pillow - I can't stand any unsynced gaming and even at 45 FPS it looks as good as VSync 60.
     
  16. Jynnantonix

    Jynnantonix Simracer

    I know right? I actually got a 1080 about a year ago and hated it, because even 80+ fps looked way worse than 50-60fps freesync on my aging rx480, so I sent it straight back!
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  17. NeRo2

    NeRo2 Gamer

    2018-11-29 00:48:28 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 4161 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 69.350 - Min: 49 - Max: 96

    With NV Driver 417.01, NV Panel Settings to default and ACC v0.3.5
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  18. Shaddix

    Shaddix Alien

    ACC:
    i used now my system with the Xeon processor and new 2070 (non OC and just the bad chip) and later the Ryzen PC with 2070 will be tested too:

    Default FOV 54:
    2018-11-29 20:16:49 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 5592 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 93.200 - Min: 75 - Max: 138

    FOV 45:
    2018-11-29 20:18:38 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 5492 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 91.533 - Min: 71 - Max: 138
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  19. liakjim

    liakjim Alien

    Ok

    Intel i5 4460, AMD 480 4GB ( @1300Mhz) , 8 GB Ram

    2018-11-29 23:38:38 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 2341 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 39.017 - Min: 28 - Max: 57
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
  20. f_deutsch

    f_deutsch Simracer

    2018-11-29 18:53:24 - AC2-Win64-Shipping
    Frames: 2890 - Time: 60000ms - Avg: 48.167 - Min: 31 - Max: 71

    i5-2500k @ 4.4 Ghz
    16GB 1600 RAM
    GTX 1060 3GB

    Using same ACC configuration as described on first message.

    I will update my rig in about a month, so will perform the benchmark again. I may play with the same CPU with new video card and the new CPU with the old video card just to check.

    AC2-Win64-Shipping 2018-11-29 18-47-02-86.png
     
    LeDude83 likes this.
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Launcher crashes on start (solved: disable gpu accelerated launcher) Jan 3, 2015
Chit Chat Room What is "GPU-accelerated startup"? May 12, 2014
Chit Chat Room GPU accelerated game launcher? Dec 5, 2013
Suggestions GPU-accelerated game launcher Nov 24, 2013
ACC General Discussions Epic Games vs Steam - Which Distribution Platform for ACC? Saturday at 9:45 PM
ACC General Discussions Realtime app for ACC? Saturday at 7:07 PM
ACC Controls & Peripherals SRM Fanatec conversion kit / ACC / Slimax issue Saturday at 6:42 PM
ACC Troubleshooting ACC doesn't open Saturday at 5:28 PM
ACC Multiplayer Cannot access MP lobby Saturday at 2:29 PM
ACC Troubleshooting Multiplayer Fatal Error V0.4.1, ACC Official Server, Logs attached Saturday at 12:39 AM
Multiplayer Bugs & Issues Multiplayer Fatal Error V0.4.1, ACC Official Server, Logs attached Saturday at 12:34 AM
ACC Controls & Peripherals ACC not detecting Fanatec Wheel Friday at 10:31 PM
ACC General Discussions ACC VR in Build 0.4 - Any Better? Friday at 10:20 PM
ACC Troubleshooting Error in ACC.log Friday at 12:52 PM
ACC Physics ACC feel compared AC . Thursday at 11:16 PM

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice