1. Do you need support for Assetto Corsa Competizione? Please use the proper forum below and ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Logs" folder in your c:\users\*youruser*\AppData\Local\AC2\Saved. The "AppData" folder is hidden by default, check "Hidden items" in your Windows view properties. If you report a crash, ALWAYS zip and attach the WHOLE "Crashes" folder in the same directory. Do not post "I have the same issue" in an existing thread with a game crash, always open your own thread. Do not PM developers and staff members for personal troubleshooting and support.
  2. As part of our continuous maintenance and improvements to Assetto Corsa Competizione we will be releasing small updates on a regular basis during the esports season which might not go through the usual announcement process detailing the changes until a later version update where these changes will be listed retrospectively.
  3. If ACC doesn't start with an error or the executable is missing, please add your entire Steam directory to the exceptions in your antivirus software, run a Steam integrity check or reinstall the game altogether. Make sure you add the User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione folder to your antivirus/Defender exceptions and exclude it from any file sharing app (GDrive, OneDrive or Dropbox)! The Corsair iCue software is also known to conflict with Input Device initialization, if the game does not start up and you have such devices, please try disabling the iCue software and try again. [file:unknown] [line: 95] secure crt: invalid error is a sign of antivirus interference, while [Pak chunk signing mismatch on chunk] indicates a corrupted installation that requires game file verification.
  4. When reporting an issue with saved games, please always zip and attach your entire User/Documents/Assetto Corsa Competizione/Savegame folder, along with the logs and the crash folder (when reporting related to a crash).
ACC general support Note about silent updates Startup troubleshooting ACC savegame reports

Benchmark results, food for thought

Discussion in 'Chit Chat Room' started by Lino Carreira, Oct 22, 2015.

Page 5 of 26
  1. Blamer

    Blamer Hardcore Simmer

    These are my two benchmarks. First one with single screen full screen, second one with triple screen windowed (because of different screens resolution)

    • Single screen - Full screen ON
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 19552
    FPS: AVG=133 MIN=43 MAX=205 VARIANCE=18 CPU=78%

    LOADING TIME: 14s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:2X SHDW:2048 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 4 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:2 HDR:0 FXAA:0 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    ​
    • Triple screen - Windowed
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 10739
    FPS: AVG=73 MIN=41 MAX=91 VARIANCE=2 CPU=53%

    LOADING TIME: 14s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 (5760x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: OFF
    AA:2X AF:2X SHDW:2048 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 4 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:2 HDR:0 FXAA:0 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    ​
    I'll also make a test with NVidia Surround in fullscreen, but honestly I don't like it because it adapts to the lowest resolution of my three screens (2x 1920x1080, 1x 1680x1050)
     
    Blamer, Oct 23, 2015
    #81
  2. wesuperstar

    wesuperstar Gamer

    I tried that AA8x in video.ini. Ingame it tells me it´s off(slider). It looks like it´s off. But fps are like 8x. So i switched back to 4x+fxaa. Looks much better and fps are too. Maybe you want to overlook this too.

    All in all no surprises at my settings. It is what i have known before.

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 12595
    FPS: AVG=85 MIN=60 MAX=102 VARIANCE=1 CPU=42%

    LOADING TIME: 10s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:3
    PP: QLT:1 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:1 DOF:1 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
     
    wesuperstar, Oct 23, 2015
    #82
  3. Jack Bancroft

    Jack Bancroft Simracer

    Nope, AC installed on my 2TB WD Green HDD
     
    Jack Bancroft, Oct 23, 2015
    #83
  4. Jack Bancroft

    Jack Bancroft Simracer

    Benchmark I did last night:

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 12965
    FPS: AVG=88 MIN=29 MAX=171 VARIANCE=4 CPU=49%

    LOADING TIME: 12s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:4 DOF:4 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    And this morning:

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 10892
    FPS: AVG=74 MIN=22 MAX=158 VARIANCE=2 CPU=44%

    LOADING TIME: 11s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:4 DOF:4 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    Both using the same settings. Not sure why there is such a difference, it's as if my computer hasn't woken up yet :p
     
    Jack Bancroft, Oct 23, 2015
    #84
  5. Guybrush Threepwood

    Guybrush Threepwood Alien

    It thinks I have a better card than I do. In actual fact I only have a Radeon 7970. The old girl is still holding it's own at 1440p:

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 10689
    FPS: AVG=72 MIN=32 MAX=110 VARIANCE=7 CPU=63%

    LOADING TIME: 16s
    GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 / HD 7900 Series (2560x1440)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x300-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:8X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:4
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:3 DOF:3 RAYS:0 HEAT:0
     
    Guybrush Threepwood, Oct 23, 2015
    #85
  6. Ben Lee

    Ben Lee Alien

    I'm a little confused about the "points" score. I'd have thought that would have been calculated by the sheer raw power of your rig, but it seems to be linked to the FPS generated? A bit like other benchmarks like 3DMark or whatever, it gave you a score based upon your rig?
     
    Ben Lee, Oct 23, 2015
    #86
  7. wesuperstar

    wesuperstar Gamer

    yes its fps based. if i uncheck and turn everything to the left for highest fps i get almost 40000pts
     
    wesuperstar, Oct 23, 2015
    #87
  8. A.r.e.s.

    A.r.e.s. Hardcore Simmer


    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 7079
    FPS: AVG=48 MIN=21 MAX=90 VARIANCE=0 CPU=29%

    LOADING TIME: 12s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (5120x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 8
    FULLSCREEN: OFF
    AA:8X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:5
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1


    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 8468
    FPS: AVG=57 MIN=37 MAX=110 VARIANCE=0 CPU=36%

    LOADING TIME: 13s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti (5120x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 8
    FULLSCREEN: OFF
    AA:4X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:5
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:1 GLR:5 DOF:5 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    Well this is me.
     
    A.r.e.s., Oct 23, 2015
    #88
  9. Guido Trampe

    Guido Trampe Simracer

    I actualy like that. Whats the use for a benchmark that is not based on the the values you actualy use. Sure i get trilled with new scores @3dmarks when i have installed new hardware. But the single screen score is in no relation to what I actualy use when racing. We now finaly have a tool that can predict an outcome for an upgrade, based on the benchmarks done (and logged here) by colleges. Best would be if we can somehow get this in al database.
     
    Guido Trampe, Oct 23, 2015
    #89
  10. Mike1304

    Mike1304 Alien

    I think there must be something wrong. Here are my benchmark-results (playing triple-screen 3D-vision with 2 titans in SLI, Refelections to STATIC):

    PP-Effects OFF:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 8800
    FPS: AVG=60 MIN=37 MAX=120 VARIANCE=4 CPU=63%

    LOADING TIME: 12s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (5980x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 8
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:4 HDR:0 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0

    PP-Effects ON:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 8735
    FPS: AVG=59 MIN=34 MAX=90 VARIANCE=1 CPU=53%

    LOADING TIME: 12s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN (5980x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 8
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:16X SHDW:4096 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0

    What bothers me is that both tests deliver almost the same points and the same average FPS. The experience while watching the benchmark was also very fluid. So with PP-effects ON I only lost 1 FPS (59 average FPS instead of 60 average FPS with PP off) BUT THIS IS NOT what I experience while PLAYING!?
    If I PLAY with PP-Effects ON I would NEVER get an average of 59 FPS. With PP-Effects ON I have always FPS-drops especially with so many opponents like shown in the benchmark.
    So why is the benchmark so good with PP ON and why is the gaming-experience bad with PP ON?
    Could it be the ForceFeedback of the wheel? Because during gaming the FF is working and during the benchmark the FF is off? Is the FF so heavy on performance (so that it would make the benchmark senseless...)?

    By the way: What means VARIANCE? And what means CPU=x% ?

    EDIT: It would be nice if we could exactly PLAY the same race like in the benchmark so I could test what is the exact difference in FPS between benchmark and real driving-experience. Does anybody know if this is possible? Track is clear (Spa) but the rest not (Quickrace with how many opponents and which ones? Which weather settings and so on....)
     
    Mike1304, Oct 23, 2015
    #90
  11. thodoris1884

    thodoris1884 Racer

    [​IMG]
     
    thodoris1884, Oct 23, 2015
    #91
  12. eXo

    eXo Racer

    [​IMG]

    Oh well, not really a good result as i expected.
    I'll try to tweak some setting a bit to see if i can get something better even if i think that it could be mostly caused by my ppset
     
    eXo, Oct 23, 2015
    #92
  13. A.r.e.s.

    A.r.e.s. Hardcore Simmer

    try lowering blur
     
    A.r.e.s., Oct 23, 2015
    #93
    eXo likes this.
  14. donShere

    donShere Hardcore Simmer

    With V-sync

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 17488
    FPS: AVG=119 MIN=68 MAX=148 VARIANCE=1 CPU=61%

    LOADING TIME: 14s
    GPU: AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:2X AF:4X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 2 SMOKE:2
    PP: QLT:3 HDR:0 FXAA:0 GLR:1 DOF:4 RAYS:1 HEAT:0

    GPU usage with or without doesn't give as much difference as before
    and stays at about 98 to 99%. Same with CPU usage that stays around 60%.
     
    donShere, Oct 23, 2015
    #94
  15. baboon

    baboon Alien

    I have done a few comparism runs for my system:

    base
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
POINTS: 11439
FPS: AVG=78 MIN=44 MAX=120 VARIANCE=0 CPU=42%

LOADING TIME: 12s
GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0
    same with PP (only QLT+GLR) on ultra:
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
POINTS: 10661
FPS: AVG=72 MIN=43 MAX=111 VARIANCE=0 CPU=39%

LOADING TIME: 12s
GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:0
    same as base but with heat effects:
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
POINTS: 11463
FPS: AVG=78 MIN=45 MAX=110 VARIANCE=0 CPU=40%

LOADING TIME: 12s
GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    same as base+heat but with mirror quality on high:
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
POINTS: 11282
FPS: AVG=77 MIN=24 MAX=128 VARIANCE=0 CPU=41%

LOADING TIME: 12s
GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
    same as base+heat but with shadow quality on high instead of medium:
    Code:
    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
POINTS: 11012
FPS: AVG=75 MIN=29 MAX=136 VARIANCE=0 CPU=38%

LOADING TIME: 12s
GPU: AMD Radeon R9 200 Series (1920x1080)
OS-Version: 6.1.7601 (Service Pack 1) 0x300-0x1
CPU CORES: 4
FULLSCREEN: ON
AA:4X AF:8X SHDW:2048 BLUR:0
WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:2
PP: QLT:4 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:4 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
     
    baboon, Oct 23, 2015
    #95
  16. LRM

    LRM Simracer

    First time loading :

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 10223
    FPS: AVG=69 MIN=19 MAX=147 VARIANCE=0 CPU=35%

    LOADING TIME: 37s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:4X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1

    Seconde time loading :

    AC VERSION: 1.3.4 (x64)
    POINTS: 10334
    FPS: AVG=70 MIN=51 MAX=90 VARIANCE=0 CPU=35%

    LOADING TIME: 12s
    GPU: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST (1920x1080)
    OS-Version: 6.2.9200 () 0x100-0x1
    CPU CORES: 4
    FULLSCREEN: ON
    AA:4X AF:4X SHDW:1024 BLUR:0
    WORLD DETAIL: 5 SMOKE:1
    PP: QLT:5 HDR:1 FXAA:0 GLR:5 DOF:0 RAYS:1 HEAT:1
     
    LRM, Oct 23, 2015
    #96
  17. wesuperstar

    wesuperstar Gamer

    Vsync and framelimiter are always disabled while running benchmark
     
    wesuperstar, Oct 23, 2015
    #97
    donShere likes this.
  18. donShere

    donShere Hardcore Simmer

    Ah, had a sneaking suspicion.:D:oops:
     
    donShere, Oct 23, 2015
    #98
  19. Guido Trampe

    Guido Trampe Simracer

    I have done several benhmarks. The Base is The Way I Play at the moment. Settings as shown and with tripples, 2x Radeon 7970 @ overcloked I7 @ 3800MHZ

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    Keep in mind that I use Radeon Pro for AA and AF as this gives me ~ 10FPS compared to the ingame option.
    As said I have run several test. The numbers are shown beneath:

    [​IMG]

    And in Graphs:
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]

    The problem is: For me the outcome is that almost all settings in benchmarktool give somewhat the same outcome. But that is in contradiction to when I play Assetto wher the slightest change in settings (or sometimes drivers) can give big changes to STEADY FPS. What are your thoughts on this outcome? What to think about the setting Redering low. CPU goes down... frames goes up? It doesnt make sence to me at the moment.
     
    Guido Trampe, Oct 23, 2015
    #99
    liakjim and baboon like this.
  20. tommi karsikas

    tommi karsikas Alien

    The loading time differences are nothing more than first time loading the benchmark. The HDD that you have the game installed is taking a "nap" and takes time to spool up to read the data.
    Modern 7200rpm HDD reads 80-160 MB/s for larger files, and that is plenty to get the job done in 10-12 seconds if there is no other bottleneck.
     
    tommi karsikas, Oct 23, 2015
    #100
Page 5 of 26
Similar Threads
Forum Title Date
ACC Hardware Discussions Radeon RX 5700 (XT) Users - Please Share Your Benchmark Results Jul 9, 2019
Graphics and Models/Tracks Bugs & Issues Weird FPS and benchmark results with different shadow res settings? Sep 7, 2016
ACC Hardware Discussions Benchmark mode Feb 28, 2022
ACC Virtual Reality Lets benchmark the new hardware for ACC VR Nov 21, 2020
ACC Hardware Discussions Ryzen 5 5600X + RTX 3080 Benchmark Videos Nov 5, 2020
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Can't Start a Race or a Benchmark [BitDefender/Antivirus blocking acs.exe] Dec 30, 2019
Troubleshooting - Workarounds MAIN_T at 95, gpu usage low, benchmark at 50 fps (previousli 130ish) Nov 20, 2019
ACC Screenshots & Videos Assetto Corsa Competizione - Benchmark - Nvidia RTX 2060 (i7 9700k) 1080p Apr 24, 2019
ACC Hardware Discussions The ACC CPU Benchmark Thread Dec 7, 2018
ACC Hardware Discussions The ACC GPU Benchmark Thread Nov 23, 2018
ACC Hardware Discussions The ACC Benchmark Thread Nov 18, 2018
ACC Hardware Discussions ACC benchmark tool ? Aug 5, 2018
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Can't play races or launch benchmarks Mar 24, 2018
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Can't launch races or benchmark Feb 18, 2018
Troubleshooting - Workarounds Benchmark displays HD Graphics 4000 whereas I have a GPU Oct 15, 2017

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Accept Learn More...
    Dismiss Notice